{"title":"为什么经济学不是一门进化科学","authors":"T. Veblen","doi":"10.2307/1882952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reprint of the article \"Why is economics not an evolutionary science?,\" by T. Veblen, published in the \"Quarterly Journal of Economics\" is presented. The article questions the premise that physics of equilibrium thermodynamics is relevant to analyzing economic systems. The author suggested that the only rational approach is to assume that economies evolve. He also argues that the economy can be described but have no effective theory of change and development.","PeriodicalId":427914,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought Articles","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1898-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1642","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Economics is not an Evolutionary Science\",\"authors\":\"T. Veblen\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1882952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A reprint of the article \\\"Why is economics not an evolutionary science?,\\\" by T. Veblen, published in the \\\"Quarterly Journal of Economics\\\" is presented. The article questions the premise that physics of equilibrium thermodynamics is relevant to analyzing economic systems. The author suggested that the only rational approach is to assume that economies evolve. He also argues that the economy can be described but have no effective theory of change and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Thought Articles\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1898-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1642\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Thought Articles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1882952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought Articles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1882952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1642
摘要
文章《为什么经济学不是一门进化的科学?》，发表在《经济学季刊》(Quarterly Journal of Economics)上。本文对平衡热力学物理学与分析经济系统有关的前提提出了质疑。作者认为，唯一理性的方法是假设经济是进化的。他还认为，经济可以被描述，但没有有效的理论的变化和发展。
A reprint of the article "Why is economics not an evolutionary science?," by T. Veblen, published in the "Quarterly Journal of Economics" is presented. The article questions the premise that physics of equilibrium thermodynamics is relevant to analyzing economic systems. The author suggested that the only rational approach is to assume that economies evolve. He also argues that the economy can be described but have no effective theory of change and development.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
