刑事程序的司法审查

W. Hays, Alex du Sautoy
{"title":"刑事程序的司法审查","authors":"W. Hays, Alex du Sautoy","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2096327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The task of judicial review entails an assessment about the relative institutional competence of, on the one hand, the public authority which made the decision and, on the other hand, the court or tribunal tasked with judging the legality of that decision. This reflects how the Supreme Court in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission analysed the task of the Commission when hearing appeals and statutory reviews of decisions taken by the Secretary of State in the national security context.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Review of the Criminal Process\",\"authors\":\"W. Hays, Alex du Sautoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2096327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. The task of judicial review entails an assessment about the relative institutional competence of, on the one hand, the public authority which made the decision and, on the other hand, the court or tribunal tasked with judging the legality of that decision. This reflects how the Supreme Court in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission analysed the task of the Commission when hearing appeals and statutory reviews of decisions taken by the Secretary of State in the national security context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2096327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2096327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 司法审查的任务需要对作出决定的公共当局和负责判断该决定的合法性的法院或法庭的相对体制能力进行评估。这反映了最高法院在R (Begum)诉特别移民上诉委员会一案中如何分析委员会在听取上诉和对国务卿在国家安全范围内所作决定进行法定审查时的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judicial Review of the Criminal Process
1. The task of judicial review entails an assessment about the relative institutional competence of, on the one hand, the public authority which made the decision and, on the other hand, the court or tribunal tasked with judging the legality of that decision. This reflects how the Supreme Court in R (Begum) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission analysed the task of the Commission when hearing appeals and statutory reviews of decisions taken by the Secretary of State in the national security context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信