系统集成方法

{"title":"系统集成方法","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jhss.05.04.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article conducts a comparative analysis of the concepts of two types of combinations claiming durability and indestructibility: “system” as an artificial-technical combination and “complex” as a natural-historical one. It is argued that the system-complex approach in science is an oxymoron that has no real denotation.","PeriodicalId":267360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System-Integrated Approach\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jhss.05.04.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article conducts a comparative analysis of the concepts of two types of combinations claiming durability and indestructibility: “system” as an artificial-technical combination and “complex” as a natural-historical one. It is argued that the system-complex approach in science is an oxymoron that has no real denotation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.05.04.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jhss.05.04.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较分析了两种具有耐久性和不可摧毁性的组合概念:作为人工技术组合的“系统”和作为自然历史组合的“复杂”。有人认为,科学中的系统复杂性方法是一种矛盾修饰法,没有真正的外延。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System-Integrated Approach
The article conducts a comparative analysis of the concepts of two types of combinations claiming durability and indestructibility: “system” as an artificial-technical combination and “complex” as a natural-historical one. It is argued that the system-complex approach in science is an oxymoron that has no real denotation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信