{"title":"以信仰为基础的青年工作走向何方?","authors":"N. Thompson","doi":"10.1163/9789004396555_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the global financial crash of the early twenty-first century, youth and community work has seen a decrease in funding alongside an increase in need. The effect of the dominantly right-wing response to the fiscal crisis on Western economies has seen both a reduction in state funding for work with young people and communities, as well as a decrease in resources and increase in burden on the charities sector. This has severely impacted on youth work both in contexts where state funding was previously available, and in other contexts where the provision of services for young people relies solely on the voluntary, community and charities sectors. \n \nThe years of austerity politics that have followed the financial crisis in the UK have led to severe cuts to state-funded youth work with budgets no longer ring-fenced at national level, and youth services set to be the first public service to completely disappear (Jeffs, 2015). Much youth work has been commissioned out with lower budgets and/or taken on by the struggling charities sector. Possibly the most consistently funded youth work over recent years has been that undertaken by faith groups. Whilst these faith groups have often operated rather separately from secular youth work providers (and even from each other), it is argued that times of challenge also bring opportunities for creative practice (Coburn and Gormally, 2017). \n \nAs funding for youth services has declined over recent years in the UK, there has been an increase in partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. These partnerships take various forms including faith-based projects employing non-religious staff or volunteers, local authorities or other funders commissioning work out to faith-based providers, as well as a range of more mutually negotiated, equal partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. Whilst statutory and other secular youth services have been subject to a neoliberal ‘targets and outcomes’ culture over recent decades, faith-based youth work has largely avoided this (Jeffs, 2015). \n \nThis chapter explores what the future of faith-based youth work might look like. In particular, it considers the recent growth in partnership working between faith-based and secular youth work, and the need for this to continue in an uncertain future for public services. It examines how these partnerships increase the capacity for faith-based youth work to contribute to civil society and continue to grow in prominence as a key player in the provision of youth and community services. It also identifies the increasing challenges presented to faith-based youth work by the right-wing ideologies that have gained in prominence in the UK and beyond. These include not just the austerity agenda but also a discourse of surveillance and suspicion. In the UK, this is seen particularly through recent counter-extremism legislation and calls for faith-based youth work providers to be registered, monitored and inspected (Home Office, 2015). Such ideologies of suspicion and surveillance have gained a platform on a global level, perhaps most clearly illustrated by the movements which drove the Brexit vote and the election of Donald Trump as President of the USA. This backdrop of suspicion makes the increase in partnership working all the more pertinent and crucial in breaking down misunderstandings. \n \nThe discussion in this chapter draws on research conducted with 15 youth workers involved in partnership working between Christian and secular organisations. The research brings out the positive and negative experiences of the youth workers and the shared values held between the partners. Whilst this research focused on Christian-secular partnerships in the UK, the discussion connects the findings, albeit to a limited extent, to some wider contexts. \nThe chapter concludes that the future of faith-based youth work is in the continuation and expansion of such partnerships between the secular and faith-based sectors. These partnerships have a clear role to play in plugging the gaps in provision and enabling workers and organisations to support each other in a climate where they are stretched and under-resourced. The discussion draws on the concept of ‘progressive localism’ (Featherstone et al, 2011) to argue that these partnerships need to go further to form an active resistance to right-wing ideologies. Both secular and faith-based youth work contain strands and traditions of radical practice that have a role to play in actively and collaboratively resisting neoliberal culture and standing up for those who are most affected by growing inequality (de St Croix, 2010; Pimlott, 2015a).","PeriodicalId":235589,"journal":{"name":"Youth Work","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Is Faith-Based Youth Work Heading?\",\"authors\":\"N. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004396555_009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the global financial crash of the early twenty-first century, youth and community work has seen a decrease in funding alongside an increase in need. The effect of the dominantly right-wing response to the fiscal crisis on Western economies has seen both a reduction in state funding for work with young people and communities, as well as a decrease in resources and increase in burden on the charities sector. This has severely impacted on youth work both in contexts where state funding was previously available, and in other contexts where the provision of services for young people relies solely on the voluntary, community and charities sectors. \\n \\nThe years of austerity politics that have followed the financial crisis in the UK have led to severe cuts to state-funded youth work with budgets no longer ring-fenced at national level, and youth services set to be the first public service to completely disappear (Jeffs, 2015). Much youth work has been commissioned out with lower budgets and/or taken on by the struggling charities sector. Possibly the most consistently funded youth work over recent years has been that undertaken by faith groups. Whilst these faith groups have often operated rather separately from secular youth work providers (and even from each other), it is argued that times of challenge also bring opportunities for creative practice (Coburn and Gormally, 2017). \\n \\nAs funding for youth services has declined over recent years in the UK, there has been an increase in partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. These partnerships take various forms including faith-based projects employing non-religious staff or volunteers, local authorities or other funders commissioning work out to faith-based providers, as well as a range of more mutually negotiated, equal partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. Whilst statutory and other secular youth services have been subject to a neoliberal ‘targets and outcomes’ culture over recent decades, faith-based youth work has largely avoided this (Jeffs, 2015). \\n \\nThis chapter explores what the future of faith-based youth work might look like. In particular, it considers the recent growth in partnership working between faith-based and secular youth work, and the need for this to continue in an uncertain future for public services. It examines how these partnerships increase the capacity for faith-based youth work to contribute to civil society and continue to grow in prominence as a key player in the provision of youth and community services. It also identifies the increasing challenges presented to faith-based youth work by the right-wing ideologies that have gained in prominence in the UK and beyond. These include not just the austerity agenda but also a discourse of surveillance and suspicion. In the UK, this is seen particularly through recent counter-extremism legislation and calls for faith-based youth work providers to be registered, monitored and inspected (Home Office, 2015). Such ideologies of suspicion and surveillance have gained a platform on a global level, perhaps most clearly illustrated by the movements which drove the Brexit vote and the election of Donald Trump as President of the USA. This backdrop of suspicion makes the increase in partnership working all the more pertinent and crucial in breaking down misunderstandings. \\n \\nThe discussion in this chapter draws on research conducted with 15 youth workers involved in partnership working between Christian and secular organisations. The research brings out the positive and negative experiences of the youth workers and the shared values held between the partners. Whilst this research focused on Christian-secular partnerships in the UK, the discussion connects the findings, albeit to a limited extent, to some wider contexts. \\nThe chapter concludes that the future of faith-based youth work is in the continuation and expansion of such partnerships between the secular and faith-based sectors. These partnerships have a clear role to play in plugging the gaps in provision and enabling workers and organisations to support each other in a climate where they are stretched and under-resourced. The discussion draws on the concept of ‘progressive localism’ (Featherstone et al, 2011) to argue that these partnerships need to go further to form an active resistance to right-wing ideologies. Both secular and faith-based youth work contain strands and traditions of radical practice that have a role to play in actively and collaboratively resisting neoliberal culture and standing up for those who are most affected by growing inequality (de St Croix, 2010; Pimlott, 2015a).\",\"PeriodicalId\":235589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Youth Work\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Youth Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396555_009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396555_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
自21世纪初全球金融危机以来,青年和社区工作的资金减少,需求增加。以右翼势力为主导的对财政危机的反应对西方经济的影响是,国家对年轻人和社区工作的资助减少了,慈善部门的资源减少了,负担增加了。这严重影响了青年工作,无论是在以前可以获得国家资助的情况下,还是在为年轻人提供服务完全依赖于志愿、社区和慈善部门的其他情况下。英国金融危机之后的紧缩政治导致了国家资助的青年工作的严重削减,预算不再在国家层面上被隔离,青年服务将成为第一个完全消失的公共服务(杰夫斯,2015)。许多青年工作被委托以较低的预算和/或由苦苦挣扎的慈善机构承担。近年来,最稳定的资助青年工作可能是由信仰团体承担的。虽然这些信仰团体往往与世俗的青年工作提供者(甚至彼此之间)分开运作,但有人认为,挑战的时代也为创造性实践带来了机会(Coburn和Gormally, 2017)。近年来,由于英国对青年服务的资助有所减少,世俗和基于信仰的提供者之间的合作关系有所增加。这些伙伴关系有多种形式,包括以信仰为基础的项目,雇用非宗教工作人员或志愿者、地方当局或其他资助者委托以信仰为基础的提供者开展工作,以及世俗和信仰为基础的提供者之间相互协商、平等的一系列伙伴关系。虽然近几十年来,法定和其他世俗青年服务一直受到新自由主义“目标和结果”文化的影响,但基于信仰的青年工作在很大程度上避免了这一点(杰夫斯,2015)。本章探讨以信仰为基础的青年工作的未来可能是什么样子。它特别考虑到最近在基于信仰的青年工作和世俗青年工作之间的伙伴关系工作方面的增长,以及在不确定的未来公共服务方面继续这种伙伴关系的必要性。报告探讨了这些伙伴关系如何增强以信仰为基础的青年工作为民间社会做出贡献的能力,并继续作为提供青年和社区服务的关键参与者而日益突出。报告还指出,在英国及其他地区日益突出的右翼意识形态给以信仰为基础的青年工作带来了越来越大的挑战。这不仅包括紧缩议程,还包括关于监视和怀疑的讨论。在英国,这一点在最近的反极端主义立法中尤为明显,并呼吁对基于信仰的青年工作提供者进行登记、监督和检查(Home Office, 2015)。这种怀疑和监视的意识形态在全球范围内获得了一个平台,推动英国脱欧公投和唐纳德·特朗普当选美国总统的运动或许是最清楚的例证。在这种猜疑的背景下,合作伙伴关系的增加对于消除误解更加相关和关键。本章的讨论借鉴了对参与基督教和世俗组织之间合作工作的15名青年工作者进行的研究。研究揭示了青年工作者的积极和消极经历以及合作伙伴之间的共同价值观。虽然这项研究的重点是英国的基督教与世俗关系,但讨论将这些发现(尽管在有限程度上)与更广泛的背景联系起来。本章的结论是,基于信仰的青年工作的未来在于继续和扩大世俗和基于信仰的部门之间的这种伙伴关系。这些伙伴关系在填补供应缺口方面发挥着明确的作用,并使工人和组织能够在资源紧张和资源不足的情况下相互支持。讨论借鉴了“进步的地方主义”的概念(Featherstone等人,2011),认为这些伙伴关系需要进一步形成对右翼意识形态的积极抵抗。世俗和基于信仰的青年工作都包含激进实践的分支和传统,这些实践在积极和协作地抵制新自由主义文化和为那些受日益严重的不平等影响最大的人挺身而出方面发挥着作用(de St Croix, 2010;Pimlott, 2015)。
Since the global financial crash of the early twenty-first century, youth and community work has seen a decrease in funding alongside an increase in need. The effect of the dominantly right-wing response to the fiscal crisis on Western economies has seen both a reduction in state funding for work with young people and communities, as well as a decrease in resources and increase in burden on the charities sector. This has severely impacted on youth work both in contexts where state funding was previously available, and in other contexts where the provision of services for young people relies solely on the voluntary, community and charities sectors.
The years of austerity politics that have followed the financial crisis in the UK have led to severe cuts to state-funded youth work with budgets no longer ring-fenced at national level, and youth services set to be the first public service to completely disappear (Jeffs, 2015). Much youth work has been commissioned out with lower budgets and/or taken on by the struggling charities sector. Possibly the most consistently funded youth work over recent years has been that undertaken by faith groups. Whilst these faith groups have often operated rather separately from secular youth work providers (and even from each other), it is argued that times of challenge also bring opportunities for creative practice (Coburn and Gormally, 2017).
As funding for youth services has declined over recent years in the UK, there has been an increase in partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. These partnerships take various forms including faith-based projects employing non-religious staff or volunteers, local authorities or other funders commissioning work out to faith-based providers, as well as a range of more mutually negotiated, equal partnerships between secular and faith-based providers. Whilst statutory and other secular youth services have been subject to a neoliberal ‘targets and outcomes’ culture over recent decades, faith-based youth work has largely avoided this (Jeffs, 2015).
This chapter explores what the future of faith-based youth work might look like. In particular, it considers the recent growth in partnership working between faith-based and secular youth work, and the need for this to continue in an uncertain future for public services. It examines how these partnerships increase the capacity for faith-based youth work to contribute to civil society and continue to grow in prominence as a key player in the provision of youth and community services. It also identifies the increasing challenges presented to faith-based youth work by the right-wing ideologies that have gained in prominence in the UK and beyond. These include not just the austerity agenda but also a discourse of surveillance and suspicion. In the UK, this is seen particularly through recent counter-extremism legislation and calls for faith-based youth work providers to be registered, monitored and inspected (Home Office, 2015). Such ideologies of suspicion and surveillance have gained a platform on a global level, perhaps most clearly illustrated by the movements which drove the Brexit vote and the election of Donald Trump as President of the USA. This backdrop of suspicion makes the increase in partnership working all the more pertinent and crucial in breaking down misunderstandings.
The discussion in this chapter draws on research conducted with 15 youth workers involved in partnership working between Christian and secular organisations. The research brings out the positive and negative experiences of the youth workers and the shared values held between the partners. Whilst this research focused on Christian-secular partnerships in the UK, the discussion connects the findings, albeit to a limited extent, to some wider contexts.
The chapter concludes that the future of faith-based youth work is in the continuation and expansion of such partnerships between the secular and faith-based sectors. These partnerships have a clear role to play in plugging the gaps in provision and enabling workers and organisations to support each other in a climate where they are stretched and under-resourced. The discussion draws on the concept of ‘progressive localism’ (Featherstone et al, 2011) to argue that these partnerships need to go further to form an active resistance to right-wing ideologies. Both secular and faith-based youth work contain strands and traditions of radical practice that have a role to play in actively and collaboratively resisting neoliberal culture and standing up for those who are most affected by growing inequality (de St Croix, 2010; Pimlott, 2015a).