{"title":"从未披露的测试中获得最大的信心(软件测试)","authors":"A. S. Parrish","doi":"10.1109/SECON.1992.202435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software testing cannot guarantee that a program is at least correct with respect to the inputs over which the program was tested. This is a problem when testing concurrent programs, or could also be due to the possibility of a mistake in evaluating the results of a test of a sequential program. It is shown that, even if such evaluation mistakes are eliminated, testing still cannot normally guarantee program correctness, even with respect to a single input, given most programming language implementations. Reasonably unrestrictive conditions on the language implementation are proposed to resolve this problem.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":230446,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obtaining maximum confidence from unrevealing tests (software testing)\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Parrish\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SECON.1992.202435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software testing cannot guarantee that a program is at least correct with respect to the inputs over which the program was tested. This is a problem when testing concurrent programs, or could also be due to the possibility of a mistake in evaluating the results of a test of a sequential program. It is shown that, even if such evaluation mistakes are eliminated, testing still cannot normally guarantee program correctness, even with respect to a single input, given most programming language implementations. Reasonably unrestrictive conditions on the language implementation are proposed to resolve this problem.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":230446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1992.202435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '92","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1992.202435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Obtaining maximum confidence from unrevealing tests (software testing)
Software testing cannot guarantee that a program is at least correct with respect to the inputs over which the program was tested. This is a problem when testing concurrent programs, or could also be due to the possibility of a mistake in evaluating the results of a test of a sequential program. It is shown that, even if such evaluation mistakes are eliminated, testing still cannot normally guarantee program correctness, even with respect to a single input, given most programming language implementations. Reasonably unrestrictive conditions on the language implementation are proposed to resolve this problem.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
