合法性如何在新兴资本市场运作?溢价上市与公司规模对风险的调节效应研究

Luciano Rossoni, Wesley Mendes-da-Silva
{"title":"合法性如何在新兴资本市场运作?溢价上市与公司规模对风险的调节效应研究","authors":"Luciano Rossoni, Wesley Mendes-da-Silva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2838983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on an institutional theoretical perspective, we investigated the impact of the origins of organizational legitimacy on systematic risk using a sample of 358 Brazilian companies between the years 2002 and 2007. We regard three origins of legitimacy – formal-regulatory (presence in premium listings), cultural-cognitive (board of directors), and normative (reputation) legitimacy – to empirically investigate how the company's size and adherence to premium lists moderate other sources of legitimacy. Our results indicate that only under apparently better-quality corporate governance conditions – presence in premium listings – corporate reputation and the board of directors reduce systematic risk. In addition, we show that the effect of reputation on risk is positively moderated by firm size.","PeriodicalId":181062,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does Legitimacy Operate in Emerging Capital Markets? Investigating the Moderating Effects of Premium Listings and Firm Size on Risk\",\"authors\":\"Luciano Rossoni, Wesley Mendes-da-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2838983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on an institutional theoretical perspective, we investigated the impact of the origins of organizational legitimacy on systematic risk using a sample of 358 Brazilian companies between the years 2002 and 2007. We regard three origins of legitimacy – formal-regulatory (presence in premium listings), cultural-cognitive (board of directors), and normative (reputation) legitimacy – to empirically investigate how the company's size and adherence to premium lists moderate other sources of legitimacy. Our results indicate that only under apparently better-quality corporate governance conditions – presence in premium listings – corporate reputation and the board of directors reduce systematic risk. In addition, we show that the effect of reputation on risk is positively moderated by firm size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Disclosure\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Disclosure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Disclosure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2838983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

从制度理论的角度出发,我们利用2002年至2007年间358家巴西公司的样本,研究了组织合法性起源对系统风险的影响。我们考虑了合法性的三个来源——形式-监管(溢价上市)、文化-认知(董事会)和规范(声誉)合法性——来实证研究公司的规模和对溢价上市的遵守如何调节其他合法性来源。我们的研究结果表明,只有在明显更好的公司治理条件下——在溢价上市中存在——公司声誉和董事会才能降低系统性风险。此外,我们还发现声誉对风险的影响会受到公司规模的正向调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Does Legitimacy Operate in Emerging Capital Markets? Investigating the Moderating Effects of Premium Listings and Firm Size on Risk
Drawing on an institutional theoretical perspective, we investigated the impact of the origins of organizational legitimacy on systematic risk using a sample of 358 Brazilian companies between the years 2002 and 2007. We regard three origins of legitimacy – formal-regulatory (presence in premium listings), cultural-cognitive (board of directors), and normative (reputation) legitimacy – to empirically investigate how the company's size and adherence to premium lists moderate other sources of legitimacy. Our results indicate that only under apparently better-quality corporate governance conditions – presence in premium listings – corporate reputation and the board of directors reduce systematic risk. In addition, we show that the effect of reputation on risk is positively moderated by firm size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信