2008年塞浦路斯总统竞选的新闻报道

Antigoni Themistokleous
{"title":"2008年塞浦路斯总统竞选的新闻报道","authors":"Antigoni Themistokleous","doi":"10.21825/jeps.81962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the tension created by the existence of differentiated interpretations of the freedom of the press as an institutional right and considers the regulatory potential or the constraint of self-regulation to address the implications of this tension. Qualitative content analysis of press reporting of the 2008 presidential election campaign in Cyprus and document analysis of the Cyprus Journalists’ Code of Practice and of a Guidance Note issued by the self-regulatory agency are used to analyse the data. This article demonstrates that the most fundamental challenge the press self-regulation should address is the complexity in evaluating among different but equally important liberal rights, whose conjunction creates conflict. The findings demonstrate that defining the boundaries of press freedom in order to safeguard balanced and non-discriminatory reporting is a complex process. Emphasising the public’s right to information may jeopardize the journalistic autonomy and the editorial independence as there is no straightforward way to make judgments about incommensurable values such as free speech. This article exemplifies that political reporting is a challenging context as far as the regulability of press freedom is concerned.","PeriodicalId":142850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"the Press coverage of the 2008 presidential election campaign in Cyprus\",\"authors\":\"Antigoni Themistokleous\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/jeps.81962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the tension created by the existence of differentiated interpretations of the freedom of the press as an institutional right and considers the regulatory potential or the constraint of self-regulation to address the implications of this tension. Qualitative content analysis of press reporting of the 2008 presidential election campaign in Cyprus and document analysis of the Cyprus Journalists’ Code of Practice and of a Guidance Note issued by the self-regulatory agency are used to analyse the data. This article demonstrates that the most fundamental challenge the press self-regulation should address is the complexity in evaluating among different but equally important liberal rights, whose conjunction creates conflict. The findings demonstrate that defining the boundaries of press freedom in order to safeguard balanced and non-discriminatory reporting is a complex process. Emphasising the public’s right to information may jeopardize the journalistic autonomy and the editorial independence as there is no straightforward way to make judgments about incommensurable values such as free speech. This article exemplifies that political reporting is a challenging context as far as the regulability of press freedom is concerned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Periodical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.81962\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Periodical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.81962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了对新闻自由作为一项制度性权利的不同解释所造成的紧张关系,并考虑了监管潜力或自我监管的约束,以解决这种紧张关系的影响。对2008年塞浦路斯总统竞选活动的新闻报道进行定性内容分析,并对塞浦路斯记者行为守则和自我监管机构发布的指导说明进行文件分析,以分析数据。本文表明,新闻自律应解决的最根本挑战是评估不同但同样重要的自由权利的复杂性,它们的结合会产生冲突。研究结果表明,界定新闻自由的界限,以保障平衡和非歧视性的报道是一个复杂的过程。强调公众的知情权可能会危及新闻自主性和编辑独立性,因为没有直接的方法来判断言论自由等不可通约性的价值。本文举例说明,就新闻自由的可监管性而言,政治报道是一个具有挑战性的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
the Press coverage of the 2008 presidential election campaign in Cyprus
This article examines the tension created by the existence of differentiated interpretations of the freedom of the press as an institutional right and considers the regulatory potential or the constraint of self-regulation to address the implications of this tension. Qualitative content analysis of press reporting of the 2008 presidential election campaign in Cyprus and document analysis of the Cyprus Journalists’ Code of Practice and of a Guidance Note issued by the self-regulatory agency are used to analyse the data. This article demonstrates that the most fundamental challenge the press self-regulation should address is the complexity in evaluating among different but equally important liberal rights, whose conjunction creates conflict. The findings demonstrate that defining the boundaries of press freedom in order to safeguard balanced and non-discriminatory reporting is a complex process. Emphasising the public’s right to information may jeopardize the journalistic autonomy and the editorial independence as there is no straightforward way to make judgments about incommensurable values such as free speech. This article exemplifies that political reporting is a challenging context as far as the regulability of press freedom is concerned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信