现实与有效:教育工作者对传统教学模式与合作教学模式的看法分析

P. Jorgensen, J. Fisler
{"title":"现实与有效:教育工作者对传统教学模式与合作教学模式的看法分析","authors":"P. Jorgensen, J. Fisler","doi":"10.46951/2022230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the Danielson Framework for Teaching, we compare educators’ perceptions of the effectiveness of traditional and co-teaching student teaching models. This study frames student teaching as a community of practice with Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as a key feature of the experience. This study uses a mixed methods sequential design. Our data indicate the co-teaching model outperforms the traditional student teaching model on all Danielson components and was preferred by the majority of our participants. Recommendations for teacher preparation and further study of student teaching are discussed.","PeriodicalId":190661,"journal":{"name":"Pennsylvania Teacher Educator","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realistic vs. Effective: An Analysis of Educators' Perceptions of Traditional and Co-teaching Models of Student Teaching\",\"authors\":\"P. Jorgensen, J. Fisler\",\"doi\":\"10.46951/2022230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the Danielson Framework for Teaching, we compare educators’ perceptions of the effectiveness of traditional and co-teaching student teaching models. This study frames student teaching as a community of practice with Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as a key feature of the experience. This study uses a mixed methods sequential design. Our data indicate the co-teaching model outperforms the traditional student teaching model on all Danielson components and was preferred by the majority of our participants. Recommendations for teacher preparation and further study of student teaching are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pennsylvania Teacher Educator\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pennsylvania Teacher Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46951/2022230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pennsylvania Teacher Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46951/2022230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用丹尼尔森教学框架,我们比较了教育工作者对传统和联合教学学生教学模式有效性的看法。本研究将学生教学作为一个实践社区,并将维果茨基的“近端发展区”作为体验的关键特征。本研究采用混合方法序贯设计。我们的数据表明,合作教学模式在所有Danielson组件上都优于传统的学生教学模式,并且受到大多数参与者的青睐。对教师的准备工作和学生教学的进一步研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Realistic vs. Effective: An Analysis of Educators' Perceptions of Traditional and Co-teaching Models of Student Teaching
Using the Danielson Framework for Teaching, we compare educators’ perceptions of the effectiveness of traditional and co-teaching student teaching models. This study frames student teaching as a community of practice with Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as a key feature of the experience. This study uses a mixed methods sequential design. Our data indicate the co-teaching model outperforms the traditional student teaching model on all Danielson components and was preferred by the majority of our participants. Recommendations for teacher preparation and further study of student teaching are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信