在蔬菜运输中使用塑料板条箱与聚乙烯袋的好处

K. Dorji, Kinley Wangmo, T. Wangdi
{"title":"在蔬菜运输中使用塑料板条箱与聚乙烯袋的好处","authors":"K. Dorji, Kinley Wangmo, T. Wangdi","doi":"10.55925/btagr.23.6103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower are some of the common vegetables that are grown and traded in Bhutan. It is cultivated in one part of the country and then transported to urban areas of the country for marketing. Poly sacks are commonly used for packing and transporting these vegetables. Plastic crates are recommended and promoted for use in packing and transporting vegetables but there is no study that has been conducted to prove their benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the transportation damage and economic benefit of using plastic crates during the transportation of vegetables compared to that of the poly sack. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower were harvested in the late afternoon from Chali Gewog, sorted, packed and transported to the market in Bumthang town in the same evening. At the market, vegetables were assessed for transportation damage and physiological loss of weight was recorded. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in poly packs reported transportation damage of 8.75, 8.33 and 12.50 heads against 0.96, 0.44 and 0.41 percent for the plastic crate-packed vegetable samples with significant differences at P≤0.05. Poly-packed samples had significantly higher PLW of 2.02 kg, 2.83 kg and 3.40 kg compared to much lower PLW of 0.21 kg, 0.24 kg and 0.36 kg for broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower, respectively. Among the vegetables packed in poly sacks, transportation damage was significantly higher for cauliflower at 12.5 heads compared to 8.75 and 8.33 heads for broccoli and cabbage. Transportation damage was minimal and not significantly different between the three vegetables for plastic crates sample. Harvesting damage of 0.35 was observed in broccoli while cabbage and cauliflower did not have harvesting damage. Physiological loss of weight was significantly higher in cauliflower for both packaging types. The net return from broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in plastic crates was higher at Nu.27779.4, Nu.8252.48, Nu.31127.4 compared to Nu.25232, Nu.7540 and Nu.26852 for poly sack packages, respectively. It is recommended that use of plastic crates for handling and transportation of broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower be encouraged and promoted among the stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":189886,"journal":{"name":"Bhutanese Journal of Agriculture","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of using Plastic Crate compared to Poly Sack during Transportation of Vegetables\",\"authors\":\"K. Dorji, Kinley Wangmo, T. Wangdi\",\"doi\":\"10.55925/btagr.23.6103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower are some of the common vegetables that are grown and traded in Bhutan. It is cultivated in one part of the country and then transported to urban areas of the country for marketing. Poly sacks are commonly used for packing and transporting these vegetables. Plastic crates are recommended and promoted for use in packing and transporting vegetables but there is no study that has been conducted to prove their benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the transportation damage and economic benefit of using plastic crates during the transportation of vegetables compared to that of the poly sack. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower were harvested in the late afternoon from Chali Gewog, sorted, packed and transported to the market in Bumthang town in the same evening. At the market, vegetables were assessed for transportation damage and physiological loss of weight was recorded. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in poly packs reported transportation damage of 8.75, 8.33 and 12.50 heads against 0.96, 0.44 and 0.41 percent for the plastic crate-packed vegetable samples with significant differences at P≤0.05. Poly-packed samples had significantly higher PLW of 2.02 kg, 2.83 kg and 3.40 kg compared to much lower PLW of 0.21 kg, 0.24 kg and 0.36 kg for broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower, respectively. Among the vegetables packed in poly sacks, transportation damage was significantly higher for cauliflower at 12.5 heads compared to 8.75 and 8.33 heads for broccoli and cabbage. Transportation damage was minimal and not significantly different between the three vegetables for plastic crates sample. Harvesting damage of 0.35 was observed in broccoli while cabbage and cauliflower did not have harvesting damage. Physiological loss of weight was significantly higher in cauliflower for both packaging types. The net return from broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in plastic crates was higher at Nu.27779.4, Nu.8252.48, Nu.31127.4 compared to Nu.25232, Nu.7540 and Nu.26852 for poly sack packages, respectively. It is recommended that use of plastic crates for handling and transportation of broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower be encouraged and promoted among the stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bhutanese Journal of Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bhutanese Journal of Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55925/btagr.23.6103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bhutanese Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55925/btagr.23.6103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西兰花、卷心菜和花椰菜是不丹种植和交易的常见蔬菜。它在该国的一个地区种植,然后运往该国的城市地区销售。聚乙烯袋通常用于包装和运输这些蔬菜。塑料箱被推荐和推广用于包装和运输蔬菜,但没有研究证明它们的好处。本研究的目的是评估在蔬菜运输过程中使用塑料板条箱与聚乙烯袋相比的运输损失和经济效益。西兰花、卷心菜和花椰菜是下午晚些时候从Chali Gewog收获的,经过分类、包装,当天晚上运到Bumthang镇的市场。在市场上,对蔬菜的运输损伤进行了评估,并记录了生理上的体重损失。聚氯乙烯包装的西兰花、卷心菜和花椰菜的运输损伤率分别为8.75、8.33和12.50头,而塑料板条箱包装的蔬菜样品的运输损伤率分别为0.96、0.44和0.41%,差异显著(P≤0.05)。复合包装样品的PLW分别为2.02 kg、2.83 kg和3.40 kg,显著高于西兰花、白菜和花椰菜的PLW,分别为0.21 kg、0.24 kg和0.36 kg。在聚麻袋包装蔬菜中,花椰菜为12.5穗,西兰花为8.75穗,白菜为8.33穗。三种蔬菜对塑料箱样品的运输损害最小,差异不显著。西兰花的收获损害为0.35,而白菜和花椰菜没有收获损害。两种包装类型的花椰菜的生理重量损失都明显更高。用塑料板条箱包装的西兰花、卷心菜和花椰菜的净回收率分别为Nu.27779.4、Nu.8252.48和Nu.31127.4,高于聚乙烯麻袋包装的Nu.25232、Nu.7540和Nu.26852。建议在利益相关者中鼓励和促进使用塑料板条箱来处理和运输西兰花、卷心菜和花椰菜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of using Plastic Crate compared to Poly Sack during Transportation of Vegetables
Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower are some of the common vegetables that are grown and traded in Bhutan. It is cultivated in one part of the country and then transported to urban areas of the country for marketing. Poly sacks are commonly used for packing and transporting these vegetables. Plastic crates are recommended and promoted for use in packing and transporting vegetables but there is no study that has been conducted to prove their benefits. The aim of this study was to assess the transportation damage and economic benefit of using plastic crates during the transportation of vegetables compared to that of the poly sack. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower were harvested in the late afternoon from Chali Gewog, sorted, packed and transported to the market in Bumthang town in the same evening. At the market, vegetables were assessed for transportation damage and physiological loss of weight was recorded. Broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in poly packs reported transportation damage of 8.75, 8.33 and 12.50 heads against 0.96, 0.44 and 0.41 percent for the plastic crate-packed vegetable samples with significant differences at P≤0.05. Poly-packed samples had significantly higher PLW of 2.02 kg, 2.83 kg and 3.40 kg compared to much lower PLW of 0.21 kg, 0.24 kg and 0.36 kg for broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower, respectively. Among the vegetables packed in poly sacks, transportation damage was significantly higher for cauliflower at 12.5 heads compared to 8.75 and 8.33 heads for broccoli and cabbage. Transportation damage was minimal and not significantly different between the three vegetables for plastic crates sample. Harvesting damage of 0.35 was observed in broccoli while cabbage and cauliflower did not have harvesting damage. Physiological loss of weight was significantly higher in cauliflower for both packaging types. The net return from broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower packed in plastic crates was higher at Nu.27779.4, Nu.8252.48, Nu.31127.4 compared to Nu.25232, Nu.7540 and Nu.26852 for poly sack packages, respectively. It is recommended that use of plastic crates for handling and transportation of broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower be encouraged and promoted among the stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信