作为设计问题的可审核性

H. Weigand, P. Elsas
{"title":"作为设计问题的可审核性","authors":"H. Weigand, P. Elsas","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2019.00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical developments have always played an important role in the history of accounting and auditing practice. The Smart Computing Age urges us to rethink the way auditability of organizations is designed in an effective and efficient way. The goal of this conceptual paper is to define auditability on a general level and frame it as a design problem. It particularly addresses what is considered a key concern in auditing: What should be the ramification of missing or weak completeness controls on the external audit of financial statements? The paper introduces a general auditability framework that builds on the Dutch auditing tradition but is novel in the way this proven approach is summarized and formalized in a Five Cycle model. It makes an argument for a design role for the external auditor and gives directions how this role can be filled in, making optimal use of new technological possibilities.","PeriodicalId":193238,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditability as a Design Problem\",\"authors\":\"H. Weigand, P. Elsas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBI.2019.00038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technical developments have always played an important role in the history of accounting and auditing practice. The Smart Computing Age urges us to rethink the way auditability of organizations is designed in an effective and efficient way. The goal of this conceptual paper is to define auditability on a general level and frame it as a design problem. It particularly addresses what is considered a key concern in auditing: What should be the ramification of missing or weak completeness controls on the external audit of financial statements? The paper introduces a general auditability framework that builds on the Dutch auditing tradition but is novel in the way this proven approach is summarized and formalized in a Five Cycle model. It makes an argument for a design role for the external auditor and gives directions how this role can be filled in, making optimal use of new technological possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

技术发展在会计和审计实践的历史上一直扮演着重要的角色。智能计算时代促使我们重新思考以有效和高效的方式设计组织的可审计性。这篇概念性论文的目标是在一般层面上定义可审计性,并将其作为一个设计问题。它特别解决了审计中的一个关键问题:财务报表外部审计中缺失或薄弱的完整性控制的后果是什么?本文介绍了一个通用的可审计性框架,该框架建立在荷兰审计传统的基础上,但在这种经过验证的方法被总结和形式化为五个周期模型的方式上是新颖的。它为外部审计员的设计角色进行了论证,并给出了如何发挥这一角色的指导,以最佳地利用新技术的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditability as a Design Problem
Technical developments have always played an important role in the history of accounting and auditing practice. The Smart Computing Age urges us to rethink the way auditability of organizations is designed in an effective and efficient way. The goal of this conceptual paper is to define auditability on a general level and frame it as a design problem. It particularly addresses what is considered a key concern in auditing: What should be the ramification of missing or weak completeness controls on the external audit of financial statements? The paper introduces a general auditability framework that builds on the Dutch auditing tradition but is novel in the way this proven approach is summarized and formalized in a Five Cycle model. It makes an argument for a design role for the external auditor and gives directions how this role can be filled in, making optimal use of new technological possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信