{"title":"葡萄牙古迹的修复:从1931年的雅典到1964年的威尼斯","authors":"M. Neto","doi":"10.37935/iha.aon.2022.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Portugal, the restoration of monuments was directed by the General Directorate of National Buildings and Monuments (Direção-Geral dos Edifícios e Monumentos Nacionais — DGEMN) in the period amid the two world wars and, even after 1945, when Europe was being re-erected. This entity, centralized in the Ministry of Public Works, with its own section of technicians, will respond to the ideological objectives of the Estado Novo (New Regime) of António de Oliveira Salazar (1889-1970). The dictator himself has a particular commitment towards the actions of this organization and consistently exploits the image of the nation’s heritage under restoration as an example of the regime’s competence, commitment and effectiveness. His triumphalist vision of the History of Portugal, electing the heroes responsible for the nation’s golden moments, determines as prime targets for restoration the monuments from the past linked to these figures and facts. Thus, it is essential to establish an aesthetic and artistic correspondence between these and the historical time meant to evoke. This attitude conditions, from the outset, a practice of stylistic unity in the restoration of monuments.\nThe departure from these ideological-political conditions was gradual, and the receptiveness to international principles was prompted by DGEMN’s affiliation to foreign organizations created after World War II. This came at a time when, internationally, the discussion of restoration attitudes was in the agenda.","PeriodicalId":363677,"journal":{"name":"ARTis ON","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Restoration of Monuments in Portugal: from Athens 1931 to Venice 1964 Charters\",\"authors\":\"M. Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.37935/iha.aon.2022.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Portugal, the restoration of monuments was directed by the General Directorate of National Buildings and Monuments (Direção-Geral dos Edifícios e Monumentos Nacionais — DGEMN) in the period amid the two world wars and, even after 1945, when Europe was being re-erected. This entity, centralized in the Ministry of Public Works, with its own section of technicians, will respond to the ideological objectives of the Estado Novo (New Regime) of António de Oliveira Salazar (1889-1970). The dictator himself has a particular commitment towards the actions of this organization and consistently exploits the image of the nation’s heritage under restoration as an example of the regime’s competence, commitment and effectiveness. His triumphalist vision of the History of Portugal, electing the heroes responsible for the nation’s golden moments, determines as prime targets for restoration the monuments from the past linked to these figures and facts. Thus, it is essential to establish an aesthetic and artistic correspondence between these and the historical time meant to evoke. This attitude conditions, from the outset, a practice of stylistic unity in the restoration of monuments.\\nThe departure from these ideological-political conditions was gradual, and the receptiveness to international principles was prompted by DGEMN’s affiliation to foreign organizations created after World War II. This came at a time when, internationally, the discussion of restoration attitudes was in the agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARTis ON\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARTis ON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37935/iha.aon.2022.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTis ON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37935/iha.aon.2022.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在葡萄牙,在两次世界大战期间,甚至在1945年欧洲重建期间,纪念碑的修复工作由国家建筑和纪念碑总局(dire o- geral dos Edifícios e Monumentos Nacionais - DGEMN)指导。这个实体集中在公共工程部,拥有自己的技术人员部门,将响应António de Oliveira Salazar(1889-1970)的Estado Novo(新政权)的意识形态目标。独裁者本人对该组织的行动有特别的承诺,并一贯利用正在恢复的国家遗产的形象,作为该政权的能力、承诺和效力的例子。他对葡萄牙历史的必胜主义愿景,选出了为这个国家的黄金时刻负责的英雄,并确定了修复过去与这些人物和事实相关的纪念碑的主要目标。因此,必须在这些与所要唤起的历史时间之间建立美学和艺术上的对应关系。从一开始,这种态度就决定了纪念碑修复中风格统一的做法。从这些意识形态-政治条件的脱离是逐渐的,而对国际原则的接受是由DGEMN与第二次世界大战后创建的外国组织的联系所推动的。此时,在国际上,关于恢复态度的讨论已列入议程。
The Restoration of Monuments in Portugal: from Athens 1931 to Venice 1964 Charters
In Portugal, the restoration of monuments was directed by the General Directorate of National Buildings and Monuments (Direção-Geral dos Edifícios e Monumentos Nacionais — DGEMN) in the period amid the two world wars and, even after 1945, when Europe was being re-erected. This entity, centralized in the Ministry of Public Works, with its own section of technicians, will respond to the ideological objectives of the Estado Novo (New Regime) of António de Oliveira Salazar (1889-1970). The dictator himself has a particular commitment towards the actions of this organization and consistently exploits the image of the nation’s heritage under restoration as an example of the regime’s competence, commitment and effectiveness. His triumphalist vision of the History of Portugal, electing the heroes responsible for the nation’s golden moments, determines as prime targets for restoration the monuments from the past linked to these figures and facts. Thus, it is essential to establish an aesthetic and artistic correspondence between these and the historical time meant to evoke. This attitude conditions, from the outset, a practice of stylistic unity in the restoration of monuments.
The departure from these ideological-political conditions was gradual, and the receptiveness to international principles was prompted by DGEMN’s affiliation to foreign organizations created after World War II. This came at a time when, internationally, the discussion of restoration attitudes was in the agenda.