出版补充材料:用地方、区域和全球BROOK90框架模拟蒸发:参数化和强迫的重要性。

Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Huyen Luong, R. Kronenberg, T. Grünwald, C. Bernhofer
{"title":"出版补充材料:用地方、区域和全球BROOK90框架模拟蒸发:参数化和强迫的重要性。","authors":"Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Huyen Luong, R. Kronenberg, T. Grünwald, C. Bernhofer","doi":"10.4211/hs.567d7bdc7b84465ca333b6e0c011853a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Observation and estimation of evaporation is a challenging task. Evaporation occurs on each surface and is driven by different energy sources. Thus the correct process approximation in modelling of the terrestrial water balance plays a crucial part. Here, we use a physically-based 1D lumped soil-plant-atmosphere model (BROOK90) to study the role of parameter selection and meteorological input for modelled evaporation on the point scale. Then, with the integration of the model into global, regional and local frameworks, we made cross-combinations out of their parameterization and forcing schemes to analyse the associated model uncertainty. Five sites with different land uses (grassland, cropland, deciduous broadleaf forest, two evergreen needleleaf forests) located in Saxony, Germany were selected for the study. All combinations of the model setups were validated using FLUXNET data and various goodness of fit criteria. The output from a calibrated model with in-situ meteorological measurements served as a benchmark. We focused on the analysis of the model performance with regard to different time-scales (daily, monthly, and annual). Additionally, components of evaporation are addressed, including their representation in BROOK90. Finally, all results are discussed in the context of different sources of uncertainty: model process representation, input meteorological data and evaporation measurements themselves.\n","PeriodicalId":388186,"journal":{"name":"HydroShare Resources","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplement materials for publication: Modelling evaporation with local, regional and global BROOK90 frameworks: importance of parameterization and forcing.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Huyen Luong, R. Kronenberg, T. Grünwald, C. Bernhofer\",\"doi\":\"10.4211/hs.567d7bdc7b84465ca333b6e0c011853a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Observation and estimation of evaporation is a challenging task. Evaporation occurs on each surface and is driven by different energy sources. Thus the correct process approximation in modelling of the terrestrial water balance plays a crucial part. Here, we use a physically-based 1D lumped soil-plant-atmosphere model (BROOK90) to study the role of parameter selection and meteorological input for modelled evaporation on the point scale. Then, with the integration of the model into global, regional and local frameworks, we made cross-combinations out of their parameterization and forcing schemes to analyse the associated model uncertainty. Five sites with different land uses (grassland, cropland, deciduous broadleaf forest, two evergreen needleleaf forests) located in Saxony, Germany were selected for the study. All combinations of the model setups were validated using FLUXNET data and various goodness of fit criteria. The output from a calibrated model with in-situ meteorological measurements served as a benchmark. We focused on the analysis of the model performance with regard to different time-scales (daily, monthly, and annual). Additionally, components of evaporation are addressed, including their representation in BROOK90. Finally, all results are discussed in the context of different sources of uncertainty: model process representation, input meteorological data and evaporation measurements themselves.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":388186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HydroShare Resources\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HydroShare Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.567d7bdc7b84465ca333b6e0c011853a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HydroShare Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.567d7bdc7b84465ca333b6e0c011853a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要蒸发量的观测和估算是一项具有挑战性的任务。蒸发发生在每个表面,由不同的能源驱动。因此,正确的过程近似在陆地水平衡模拟中起着至关重要的作用。本文采用基于物理的一维集总土壤-植物-大气模型(BROOK90),研究了参数选择和气象输入对点尺度模拟蒸发的作用。然后,将模型整合到全球、区域和局部框架中,将它们的参数化和强制方案进行交叉组合,分析相关模型的不确定性。选取德国萨克森州5个不同土地利用类型的样地(草地、农田、落叶阔叶林和2个常绿针叶林)进行研究。使用FLUXNET数据和各种拟合优度标准验证了所有模型设置的组合。采用现场气象测量的校准模型的输出作为基准。我们重点分析了模型在不同时间尺度(日、月、年)下的性能。此外,还讨论了蒸发组件,包括它们在BROOK90中的表示。最后,在不同不确定性来源的背景下讨论了所有结果:模式过程表示、输入气象数据和蒸发测量本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supplement materials for publication: Modelling evaporation with local, regional and global BROOK90 frameworks: importance of parameterization and forcing.
Abstract. Observation and estimation of evaporation is a challenging task. Evaporation occurs on each surface and is driven by different energy sources. Thus the correct process approximation in modelling of the terrestrial water balance plays a crucial part. Here, we use a physically-based 1D lumped soil-plant-atmosphere model (BROOK90) to study the role of parameter selection and meteorological input for modelled evaporation on the point scale. Then, with the integration of the model into global, regional and local frameworks, we made cross-combinations out of their parameterization and forcing schemes to analyse the associated model uncertainty. Five sites with different land uses (grassland, cropland, deciduous broadleaf forest, two evergreen needleleaf forests) located in Saxony, Germany were selected for the study. All combinations of the model setups were validated using FLUXNET data and various goodness of fit criteria. The output from a calibrated model with in-situ meteorological measurements served as a benchmark. We focused on the analysis of the model performance with regard to different time-scales (daily, monthly, and annual). Additionally, components of evaporation are addressed, including their representation in BROOK90. Finally, all results are discussed in the context of different sources of uncertainty: model process representation, input meteorological data and evaporation measurements themselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信