丝绸的原型:菲利普·罗斯《人性的污点》中狡猾的骗子、悲剧的黑白混血儿和施莱米尔

Ronald Emerick
{"title":"丝绸的原型:菲利普·罗斯《人性的污点》中狡猾的骗子、悲剧的黑白混血儿和施莱米尔","authors":"Ronald Emerick","doi":"10.5325/studamerjewilite.26.2007.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philip Roths 2000 novel, The Human Stainy should resonate with most academics because it is a satire on education, especially at the college level, and on Americas inability to escape its Puritan heritage. Roth satirizes everything from hypocrisy and political correctness on the college campus to declining academic standards to black history month to the publics persecution of Bill Clinton for his indiscretions with Monica Lewinsky. What complicates and oftentimes overshadows the satire, however, is Roths focus on the theme of passing in relation to his protagonist, Coleman Silk. The novel piles irony upon irony as Coleman, a light-skinned black man (\"coal\" man), decides to pass for white and ends up posing as a Jew, in essence exchanging one type of oppression for another. At the beginning of the novel, after a distinguished career as a classics professor and dean in a small New England college, Coleman is accused of racism for using the word spooks in reference to two students whose names are on his class roster but who have never appeared in class. A witch-hunt ensues, Coleman resigns, his wife dies, and Coleman seeks revenge for the injustices. In order to explore Colemans plight, Roth shifts his traditional focus from Jewish characters to African Americans. One might think that Roth intends to address the stereotypical ntagonism between blacks and Jews. But Roth avoids pitting the two minorities against each other. Instead, Roth focuses mainly on Coleman as a black man passing for white rather than on a lapsed Protestant posing as a Jew.1 In addition, Roth employs three archetypal figures, two from African American literature the wily trickster and the tragic mulatto and one from Jewish literature the schlemiel. Although some of the novels supporting characters participate in the archetypes as well, Coleman himself is the primary embodiment of all three archetypes. When he decides to pass for white, Coleman adopts the role of the trickster; however, when his world falls apart due to the charge of racism and the other tragedies that follow, Coleman evolves into the tragic mulatto and","PeriodicalId":228582,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Jewish Literature (1981-)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archetypal Silk: Wily Trickster, Tragic Mulatto, and Schlemiel in Philip Roth's “The Human Stain”\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Emerick\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/studamerjewilite.26.2007.0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Philip Roths 2000 novel, The Human Stainy should resonate with most academics because it is a satire on education, especially at the college level, and on Americas inability to escape its Puritan heritage. Roth satirizes everything from hypocrisy and political correctness on the college campus to declining academic standards to black history month to the publics persecution of Bill Clinton for his indiscretions with Monica Lewinsky. What complicates and oftentimes overshadows the satire, however, is Roths focus on the theme of passing in relation to his protagonist, Coleman Silk. The novel piles irony upon irony as Coleman, a light-skinned black man (\\\"coal\\\" man), decides to pass for white and ends up posing as a Jew, in essence exchanging one type of oppression for another. At the beginning of the novel, after a distinguished career as a classics professor and dean in a small New England college, Coleman is accused of racism for using the word spooks in reference to two students whose names are on his class roster but who have never appeared in class. A witch-hunt ensues, Coleman resigns, his wife dies, and Coleman seeks revenge for the injustices. In order to explore Colemans plight, Roth shifts his traditional focus from Jewish characters to African Americans. One might think that Roth intends to address the stereotypical ntagonism between blacks and Jews. But Roth avoids pitting the two minorities against each other. Instead, Roth focuses mainly on Coleman as a black man passing for white rather than on a lapsed Protestant posing as a Jew.1 In addition, Roth employs three archetypal figures, two from African American literature the wily trickster and the tragic mulatto and one from Jewish literature the schlemiel. Although some of the novels supporting characters participate in the archetypes as well, Coleman himself is the primary embodiment of all three archetypes. When he decides to pass for white, Coleman adopts the role of the trickster; however, when his world falls apart due to the charge of racism and the other tragedies that follow, Coleman evolves into the tragic mulatto and\",\"PeriodicalId\":228582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in American Jewish Literature (1981-)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in American Jewish Literature (1981-)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerjewilite.26.2007.0073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in American Jewish Literature (1981-)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerjewilite.26.2007.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

菲利普·罗斯2000年的小说《人性的污点》应该会引起大多数学者的共鸣,因为它讽刺了教育,尤其是大学教育,以及美国无法摆脱清教传统。从大学校园里的虚伪和政治正确,到不断下降的学术标准,再到黑人历史月,再到公众对比尔·克林顿(Bill Clinton)与莫妮卡·莱温斯基(Monica Lewinsky)的不检点行为的迫害,罗斯讽刺了一切。然而,使讽刺变得复杂和经常遮蔽的是,罗斯关注的是与他的主人公科尔曼·西尔克(Coleman Silk)有关的“逝去”主题。小说中充满了讽刺,科尔曼,一个浅肤色的黑人(“煤”人),决定冒充白人,最终假扮成犹太人,实质上是用一种压迫换了另一种压迫。在小说的开头,科尔曼在新英格兰一所小型学院担任古典文学教授和院长,有着杰出的职业生涯,他被指责为种族主义者,因为他在班级名册上使用了“幽灵”一词来指代两名学生,这两名学生的名字在他的班级名册上,但从未出现在课堂上。一场政治迫害随之而来,科尔曼辞职,他的妻子去世,科尔曼寻求对不公正的报复。为了探究科尔曼的困境,罗斯将他的传统关注点从犹太人转向了非裔美国人。有人可能会认为,罗斯想要解决黑人和犹太人之间的刻板对立。但罗斯避免让这两个少数群体相互对立。相反,罗斯主要关注的是科尔曼作为一个冒充白人的黑人,而不是一个冒充犹太人的堕落的新教徒。此外,罗斯还使用了三个原型人物,两个来自非裔美国文学,一个是狡猾的骗子,一个是悲剧的黑白混血儿,一个是犹太文学,一个是丑女。虽然小说中的一些配角也参与了这些原型,但科尔曼本人是这三种原型的主要体现。当他决定冒充白人时,科尔曼扮演了骗子的角色;然而,当他的世界因种族主义的指控和随之而来的其他悲剧而分崩离析时,科尔曼演变成一个悲剧的黑白混血儿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Archetypal Silk: Wily Trickster, Tragic Mulatto, and Schlemiel in Philip Roth's “The Human Stain”
Philip Roths 2000 novel, The Human Stainy should resonate with most academics because it is a satire on education, especially at the college level, and on Americas inability to escape its Puritan heritage. Roth satirizes everything from hypocrisy and political correctness on the college campus to declining academic standards to black history month to the publics persecution of Bill Clinton for his indiscretions with Monica Lewinsky. What complicates and oftentimes overshadows the satire, however, is Roths focus on the theme of passing in relation to his protagonist, Coleman Silk. The novel piles irony upon irony as Coleman, a light-skinned black man ("coal" man), decides to pass for white and ends up posing as a Jew, in essence exchanging one type of oppression for another. At the beginning of the novel, after a distinguished career as a classics professor and dean in a small New England college, Coleman is accused of racism for using the word spooks in reference to two students whose names are on his class roster but who have never appeared in class. A witch-hunt ensues, Coleman resigns, his wife dies, and Coleman seeks revenge for the injustices. In order to explore Colemans plight, Roth shifts his traditional focus from Jewish characters to African Americans. One might think that Roth intends to address the stereotypical ntagonism between blacks and Jews. But Roth avoids pitting the two minorities against each other. Instead, Roth focuses mainly on Coleman as a black man passing for white rather than on a lapsed Protestant posing as a Jew.1 In addition, Roth employs three archetypal figures, two from African American literature the wily trickster and the tragic mulatto and one from Jewish literature the schlemiel. Although some of the novels supporting characters participate in the archetypes as well, Coleman himself is the primary embodiment of all three archetypes. When he decides to pass for white, Coleman adopts the role of the trickster; however, when his world falls apart due to the charge of racism and the other tragedies that follow, Coleman evolves into the tragic mulatto and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信