传统Buck和2-pscB DC-DC变换器的比较

Salahaldein Ahmed, Zhong Chen
{"title":"传统Buck和2-pscB DC-DC变换器的比较","authors":"Salahaldein Ahmed, Zhong Chen","doi":"10.1109/TPEC51183.2021.9384975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to conventional Buck, the automatic current sharing mechanism is one technical advantage of the two-phase series capacitor buck converter (2-pscB), but this benefit is generally not enough to justify the limitation of output load potential. The other very important advantage is the simplified control scheme with fewer current sensing loops, as claimed in the previous publication. To fill in the gap and better understand the differences between these two topologies, this paper provides a complete comparison. Theoretical and experimental analysis of 2-pscB with a signal-variation model and the parasitic component linearization are developed to design a robust controller and to satisfy the stability and performance of the converter. The current sharing tolerance mechanism and switching node voltages in the frequency domain were as predicted. Heat distribution was not that good due to the circuit layout.","PeriodicalId":354018,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison between Conventional Buck and 2-pscB DC-DC Converters\",\"authors\":\"Salahaldein Ahmed, Zhong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPEC51183.2021.9384975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compared to conventional Buck, the automatic current sharing mechanism is one technical advantage of the two-phase series capacitor buck converter (2-pscB), but this benefit is generally not enough to justify the limitation of output load potential. The other very important advantage is the simplified control scheme with fewer current sensing loops, as claimed in the previous publication. To fill in the gap and better understand the differences between these two topologies, this paper provides a complete comparison. Theoretical and experimental analysis of 2-pscB with a signal-variation model and the parasitic component linearization are developed to design a robust controller and to satisfy the stability and performance of the converter. The current sharing tolerance mechanism and switching node voltages in the frequency domain were as predicted. Heat distribution was not that good due to the circuit layout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC51183.2021.9384975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC51183.2021.9384975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

与传统降压相比,自动电流共享机制是两相串联电容降压变换器(2-pscB)的一个技术优势,但这一优势通常不足以证明输出负载电位的限制。另一个非常重要的优点是简化的控制方案与更少的电流感应回路,在以前的出版物中声称。为了填补这一空白并更好地理解这两种拓扑之间的差异,本文提供了一个完整的比较。采用信号变化模型和寄生分量线性化对2-pscB进行了理论和实验分析,设计了鲁棒控制器,满足了变换器的稳定性和性能要求。电流共享容限机制和交换节点电压在频域上与预测一致。由于电路布局的原因,热分布不是很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison between Conventional Buck and 2-pscB DC-DC Converters
Compared to conventional Buck, the automatic current sharing mechanism is one technical advantage of the two-phase series capacitor buck converter (2-pscB), but this benefit is generally not enough to justify the limitation of output load potential. The other very important advantage is the simplified control scheme with fewer current sensing loops, as claimed in the previous publication. To fill in the gap and better understand the differences between these two topologies, this paper provides a complete comparison. Theoretical and experimental analysis of 2-pscB with a signal-variation model and the parasitic component linearization are developed to design a robust controller and to satisfy the stability and performance of the converter. The current sharing tolerance mechanism and switching node voltages in the frequency domain were as predicted. Heat distribution was not that good due to the circuit layout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信