基于通信的列车控制数据通信系统2.4 GHz频段的使用

M. Fitzmaurice
{"title":"基于通信的列车控制数据通信系统2.4 GHz频段的使用","authors":"M. Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.1109/RRCON.2006.215317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing deployment of CBTC by public transit agencies that use a data communications systems based in the 2.4 GHz ISM band has raised the concern of RF interference between CBTC equipped trains and the variety of new and existing users of this band. The vast number of RF devices that currently operate in this band (like microwave ovens, cordless telephones, medical devices etc.) have recently been augmented by the proliferation of \"Wi-Fi\" hotspots and wireless computers permitting untethered Internet access by the public and RF identification (RFID) technology. While the popularity of the band is a source of concern, paradoxically, this same popularity yields many advantages and benefits to CBTC systems that use it. Often the fact that a frequency band is \"crowded\" or heavily used (however that is defined) immediately precludes its use for those systems or services that consider themselves to be mission critical. While avoiding a heavily used frequency band for an important application is a prudent course of action, it might not be possible or, upon closer examination, even necessary. There might not be any other spectrum available or, if there is, the cost and technical risk of obtaining regulatory approval or developing the unique radio equipment could prove prohibitive. Additionally, technical advances in radio equipment and signal processing might completely obviate any perceived interference","PeriodicalId":292357,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of 2.4 GHz frequency band for Communications Based Train Control data communications systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Fitzmaurice\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RRCON.2006.215317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing deployment of CBTC by public transit agencies that use a data communications systems based in the 2.4 GHz ISM band has raised the concern of RF interference between CBTC equipped trains and the variety of new and existing users of this band. The vast number of RF devices that currently operate in this band (like microwave ovens, cordless telephones, medical devices etc.) have recently been augmented by the proliferation of \\\"Wi-Fi\\\" hotspots and wireless computers permitting untethered Internet access by the public and RF identification (RFID) technology. While the popularity of the band is a source of concern, paradoxically, this same popularity yields many advantages and benefits to CBTC systems that use it. Often the fact that a frequency band is \\\"crowded\\\" or heavily used (however that is defined) immediately precludes its use for those systems or services that consider themselves to be mission critical. While avoiding a heavily used frequency band for an important application is a prudent course of action, it might not be possible or, upon closer examination, even necessary. There might not be any other spectrum available or, if there is, the cost and technical risk of obtaining regulatory approval or developing the unique radio equipment could prove prohibitive. Additionally, technical advances in radio equipment and signal processing might completely obviate any perceived interference\",\"PeriodicalId\":292357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RRCON.2006.215317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RRCON.2006.215317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

使用基于2.4 GHz ISM频段的数据通信系统的公共交通机构越来越多地部署CBTC,这引起了对配备CBTC的列车与该频段各种新用户和现有用户之间RF干扰的担忧。目前在该频段工作的大量射频设备(如微波炉、无绳电话、医疗设备等)最近因“Wi-Fi”热点和允许公众不受限制地访问互联网的无线计算机以及射频识别(RFID)技术的扩散而得到扩大。虽然该波段的受欢迎程度令人担忧,但矛盾的是,这种受欢迎程度为使用它的CBTC系统带来了许多优势和好处。通常,一个频带“拥挤”或被大量使用(无论如何定义)的事实立即排除了那些认为自己是关键任务的系统或服务的使用。虽然避免在重要应用中使用频繁的频段是一种谨慎的做法,但这可能是不可能的,或者经过更仔细的检查,甚至是必要的。可能没有任何其他可用的频谱,或者,如果有,获得监管机构批准或开发独特无线电设备的成本和技术风险可能会令人望而却步。此外,无线电设备和信号处理的技术进步可能完全消除任何可感知的干扰
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of 2.4 GHz frequency band for Communications Based Train Control data communications systems
The increasing deployment of CBTC by public transit agencies that use a data communications systems based in the 2.4 GHz ISM band has raised the concern of RF interference between CBTC equipped trains and the variety of new and existing users of this band. The vast number of RF devices that currently operate in this band (like microwave ovens, cordless telephones, medical devices etc.) have recently been augmented by the proliferation of "Wi-Fi" hotspots and wireless computers permitting untethered Internet access by the public and RF identification (RFID) technology. While the popularity of the band is a source of concern, paradoxically, this same popularity yields many advantages and benefits to CBTC systems that use it. Often the fact that a frequency band is "crowded" or heavily used (however that is defined) immediately precludes its use for those systems or services that consider themselves to be mission critical. While avoiding a heavily used frequency band for an important application is a prudent course of action, it might not be possible or, upon closer examination, even necessary. There might not be any other spectrum available or, if there is, the cost and technical risk of obtaining regulatory approval or developing the unique radio equipment could prove prohibitive. Additionally, technical advances in radio equipment and signal processing might completely obviate any perceived interference
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信