为父母一方患有精神疾病的儿童及其家庭提供的澳大利亚项目和劳动力倡议

A. Reupert, M. Goodyear, K. Eddy, Chris. Alliston, P. Mason, D. Maybery, Elizabeth A Fudge
{"title":"为父母一方患有精神疾病的儿童及其家庭提供的澳大利亚项目和劳动力倡议","authors":"A. Reupert, M. Goodyear, K. Eddy, Chris. Alliston, P. Mason, D. Maybery, Elizabeth A Fudge","doi":"10.5172/jamh.8.3.277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to review the child, parent and family programs and workforce initiatives in Australia that target children and families where a parent has a mental illness. Fifty two individual telephone interviews were conducted with facilitators responsible for 60 child, parent, family and workforce programs across Australia. Interviewees were asked to describe (i) the program provided, (ii) the evidence framework of the program, and (iii) evaluation strategies employed. To supplement this data, three consumers and one carer were interviewed regarding their involvement in programs. Participants were identified through websites, e-discussion lists and snowball recruiting. Audio transcripts from the interviews were qualitatively analysed, using thematic analysis, alongside inter-rater reliability and member checks. Of the 60 identified programs, there were 26 child and adolescent programs, six programs for parents with a mental illness, four family programs and 24 workforce training initiatives. Program facilitators typically drew on their clinical experiences, rather than research, when developing programs. Generally, evaluation strategies were non standardised and/or measured participant satisfaction of programs. There was no systematic way of involving and supporting consumers and carers. Recommendations are made regarding evaluation training, a participation framework for consumers and carers, funding for programs, and the establishment of a formal network for sharing resources and facilitator experiences.","PeriodicalId":358240,"journal":{"name":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","volume":"108 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian programs and workforce initiatives for children and their families where a parent has a mental illness\",\"authors\":\"A. Reupert, M. Goodyear, K. Eddy, Chris. Alliston, P. Mason, D. Maybery, Elizabeth A Fudge\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/jamh.8.3.277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this study was to review the child, parent and family programs and workforce initiatives in Australia that target children and families where a parent has a mental illness. Fifty two individual telephone interviews were conducted with facilitators responsible for 60 child, parent, family and workforce programs across Australia. Interviewees were asked to describe (i) the program provided, (ii) the evidence framework of the program, and (iii) evaluation strategies employed. To supplement this data, three consumers and one carer were interviewed regarding their involvement in programs. Participants were identified through websites, e-discussion lists and snowball recruiting. Audio transcripts from the interviews were qualitatively analysed, using thematic analysis, alongside inter-rater reliability and member checks. Of the 60 identified programs, there were 26 child and adolescent programs, six programs for parents with a mental illness, four family programs and 24 workforce training initiatives. Program facilitators typically drew on their clinical experiences, rather than research, when developing programs. Generally, evaluation strategies were non standardised and/or measured participant satisfaction of programs. There was no systematic way of involving and supporting consumers and carers. Recommendations are made regarding evaluation training, a participation framework for consumers and carers, funding for programs, and the establishment of a formal network for sharing resources and facilitator experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"108 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.8.3.277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.8.3.277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是回顾澳大利亚针对父母有精神疾病的儿童和家庭的儿童、父母和家庭计划和劳动力倡议。对负责澳大利亚60个儿童、家长、家庭和劳动力项目的辅导员进行了52次电话访谈。受访者被要求描述(i)提供的课程,(ii)课程的证据框架,以及(iii)采用的评估策略。为了补充这些数据,三名消费者和一名护理人员接受了关于他们参与计划的采访。参与者是通过网站、电子讨论列表和滚雪球招募来确定的。访谈的音频记录进行了定性分析,使用主题分析,以及评分者之间的可靠性和成员检查。在已确定的60个项目中,有26个儿童和青少年项目,6个为患有精神疾病的父母提供的项目,4个家庭项目和24个劳动力培训项目。项目促进者在制定项目时通常会借鉴他们的临床经验,而不是研究。一般来说,评估策略是非标准化的和/或衡量参与者对项目的满意度。没有系统的方式让消费者和护理人员参与进来并提供支持。在评估培训、消费者和护理人员参与框架、项目资金以及建立资源共享和促进者经验的正式网络等方面提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australian programs and workforce initiatives for children and their families where a parent has a mental illness
Abstract The aim of this study was to review the child, parent and family programs and workforce initiatives in Australia that target children and families where a parent has a mental illness. Fifty two individual telephone interviews were conducted with facilitators responsible for 60 child, parent, family and workforce programs across Australia. Interviewees were asked to describe (i) the program provided, (ii) the evidence framework of the program, and (iii) evaluation strategies employed. To supplement this data, three consumers and one carer were interviewed regarding their involvement in programs. Participants were identified through websites, e-discussion lists and snowball recruiting. Audio transcripts from the interviews were qualitatively analysed, using thematic analysis, alongside inter-rater reliability and member checks. Of the 60 identified programs, there were 26 child and adolescent programs, six programs for parents with a mental illness, four family programs and 24 workforce training initiatives. Program facilitators typically drew on their clinical experiences, rather than research, when developing programs. Generally, evaluation strategies were non standardised and/or measured participant satisfaction of programs. There was no systematic way of involving and supporting consumers and carers. Recommendations are made regarding evaluation training, a participation framework for consumers and carers, funding for programs, and the establishment of a formal network for sharing resources and facilitator experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信