G. Forgues, ’Ju Mi pham rNam, rgyal rGya mtsho, S. Thakchoe
{"title":"8. 《朱米·范南·皇家王朝》的地理制图——朱米·范南·皇家王朝对“两大真理”的透视方法","authors":"G. Forgues, ’Ju Mi pham rNam, rgyal rGya mtsho, S. Thakchoe","doi":"10.1515/9783110557176-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"’Ju Mi pham rNam rgyal rGya mtsho is considered one of the greatest scholars of the rNying ma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. He is well known for his original and somewhat innovative presentation of Madhyamaka, which integrates both Candrakīrti’s tradition and Śāntarakṣita’s philosophical legacy. Two-thirds of Mipham’s (1846–1912) works concern subjects related to philosophical topics such as epistemology, ontology, and metaphysics. Although he did not shy away from intellectual confrontation and debate on more than a few occasions, he is first and foremost known for his inclusivist interpretation of Buddhist doctrines. In this paper, I will focus on his interpretation of the two truths (bden","PeriodicalId":282337,"journal":{"name":"Framing Intellectual and Lived Spaces in Early South Asia","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8. Charting the Geographies of ’Ju Mi pham rnam rgyal rgya mtsho’s Perspectivist Approach to the Two Truths\",\"authors\":\"G. Forgues, ’Ju Mi pham rNam, rgyal rGya mtsho, S. Thakchoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110557176-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"’Ju Mi pham rNam rgyal rGya mtsho is considered one of the greatest scholars of the rNying ma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. He is well known for his original and somewhat innovative presentation of Madhyamaka, which integrates both Candrakīrti’s tradition and Śāntarakṣita’s philosophical legacy. Two-thirds of Mipham’s (1846–1912) works concern subjects related to philosophical topics such as epistemology, ontology, and metaphysics. Although he did not shy away from intellectual confrontation and debate on more than a few occasions, he is first and foremost known for his inclusivist interpretation of Buddhist doctrines. In this paper, I will focus on his interpretation of the two truths (bden\",\"PeriodicalId\":282337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Framing Intellectual and Lived Spaces in Early South Asia\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Framing Intellectual and Lived Spaces in Early South Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110557176-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Framing Intellectual and Lived Spaces in Early South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110557176-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
8. Charting the Geographies of ’Ju Mi pham rnam rgyal rgya mtsho’s Perspectivist Approach to the Two Truths
’Ju Mi pham rNam rgyal rGya mtsho is considered one of the greatest scholars of the rNying ma tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. He is well known for his original and somewhat innovative presentation of Madhyamaka, which integrates both Candrakīrti’s tradition and Śāntarakṣita’s philosophical legacy. Two-thirds of Mipham’s (1846–1912) works concern subjects related to philosophical topics such as epistemology, ontology, and metaphysics. Although he did not shy away from intellectual confrontation and debate on more than a few occasions, he is first and foremost known for his inclusivist interpretation of Buddhist doctrines. In this paper, I will focus on his interpretation of the two truths (bden