拜占庭处理器和链路的分布式诊断

Joel C. Adams, K. Ramarao
{"title":"拜占庭处理器和链路的分布式诊断","authors":"Joel C. Adams, K. Ramarao","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.1989.37989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of correctly identifying the faulty processors and links in a distributed system where faulty behavior is unrestricted (Byzantine) is examined. A very general class of algorithms called evidence-based diagnosis algorithms is proposed that encompasses all past approaches to the diagnosis problem. An algorithm is presented which is proven optimal in this class. It is further shown that, in the worst case, no evidence-based diagnosis algorithm can guarantee that its diagnosis is both correct and complete, when evidence can be false. It is argued both analytically and from experimental data that in systems of N processors of which t can be faulty, the complexity of this algorithm is O(max(2 to the power of t/sup 2/, N/sup 2/)).<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":266544,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings. The 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed diagnosis of Byzantine processors and links\",\"authors\":\"Joel C. Adams, K. Ramarao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDCS.1989.37989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of correctly identifying the faulty processors and links in a distributed system where faulty behavior is unrestricted (Byzantine) is examined. A very general class of algorithms called evidence-based diagnosis algorithms is proposed that encompasses all past approaches to the diagnosis problem. An algorithm is presented which is proven optimal in this class. It is further shown that, in the worst case, no evidence-based diagnosis algorithm can guarantee that its diagnosis is both correct and complete, when evidence can be false. It is argued both analytically and from experimental data that in systems of N processors of which t can be faulty, the complexity of this algorithm is O(max(2 to the power of t/sup 2/, N/sup 2/)).<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":266544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings. The 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings. The 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1989.37989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings. The 9th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1989.37989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在错误行为不受限制(拜占庭)的分布式系统中,正确识别错误处理器和链接的问题被检查。提出了一种非常通用的算法,称为基于证据的诊断算法,它包含了所有过去的诊断问题的方法。提出了一种被证明是最优的算法。进一步表明,在最坏的情况下,当证据可能是错误的情况下,任何循证诊断算法都不能保证其诊断是正确和完整的。通过分析和实验数据表明,在N个处理器的系统中,其中t可以出错,该算法的复杂度为O(max(2 ^ t/sup 2/, N/sup 2/))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributed diagnosis of Byzantine processors and links
The problem of correctly identifying the faulty processors and links in a distributed system where faulty behavior is unrestricted (Byzantine) is examined. A very general class of algorithms called evidence-based diagnosis algorithms is proposed that encompasses all past approaches to the diagnosis problem. An algorithm is presented which is proven optimal in this class. It is further shown that, in the worst case, no evidence-based diagnosis algorithm can guarantee that its diagnosis is both correct and complete, when evidence can be false. It is argued both analytically and from experimental data that in systems of N processors of which t can be faulty, the complexity of this algorithm is O(max(2 to the power of t/sup 2/, N/sup 2/)).<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信