{"title":"4. 炒作、论证和科学传播","authors":"Adam Auch","doi":"10.1515/9789048532100-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, I examine the worry that media hype about scientific findings risks undermining public trust in science. Using the example of the seemingly exaggerated media coverage of a recent research finding concerning the effects of global climate change on the habitability of cities in the Middle East, I argue that making sense of this worry requires us to take seriously the value judgements involved in calling such coverage ‘hype’. I argue that it is judgements of credibility (who and what one ought to believe) that are put into crisis by science hype and consider a few possible approaches to resolving this crisis.","PeriodicalId":431362,"journal":{"name":"From Media Hype to Twitter Storm","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4. Hype, argumentation, and scientific dissemination\",\"authors\":\"Adam Auch\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9789048532100-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, I examine the worry that media hype about scientific findings risks undermining public trust in science. Using the example of the seemingly exaggerated media coverage of a recent research finding concerning the effects of global climate change on the habitability of cities in the Middle East, I argue that making sense of this worry requires us to take seriously the value judgements involved in calling such coverage ‘hype’. I argue that it is judgements of credibility (who and what one ought to believe) that are put into crisis by science hype and consider a few possible approaches to resolving this crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"From Media Hype to Twitter Storm\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"From Media Hype to Twitter Storm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048532100-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From Media Hype to Twitter Storm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048532100-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
4. Hype, argumentation, and scientific dissemination
In this chapter, I examine the worry that media hype about scientific findings risks undermining public trust in science. Using the example of the seemingly exaggerated media coverage of a recent research finding concerning the effects of global climate change on the habitability of cities in the Middle East, I argue that making sense of this worry requires us to take seriously the value judgements involved in calling such coverage ‘hype’. I argue that it is judgements of credibility (who and what one ought to believe) that are put into crisis by science hype and consider a few possible approaches to resolving this crisis.