不多也不少:投机的退出

J. Charlton
{"title":"不多也不少:投机的退出","authors":"J. Charlton","doi":"10.5334/MJFAR.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ten years since the seminal workshop on Speculative Realism at Goldsmiths College (Bassier), speculation has become the new noumenon of the art world: Promising the final fulfilment of the avant-garde dream that would finally emancipate the art object from indexicality, the speculative has held an irresistible appeal for artists (Beech, 1–2). As leader of the pack, Graham Harman’s Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) has become the champion of the cause. Yet, after all this speculation around realism, we seem to have got no closer to the real object of art than we ever where: OOO and its speculative variants, have left artists standing in the studio with nothing but a handful of sensual qualities that, as a symptom of transcendental withdrawal, are of little practical use. Speculation it seems has failed the facticity of practice and threatens to reduce art to little more than an indirect aesthetics. Anticipating the release of Harman’s Art and Object in mid 2019, this paper attempts to head off any speculative Greenbergian revitalisation by considering the implications of Tristan Garcia’s intensity with regard to the facticity of practice (Garcia, 2018). Central to Garcia’s ontology, intensity – the difference between what a thing is and what it is not – is seen to resists speculative naivety while informing practice’s need for certitude. Thus, unlike the speculative withdrawal of indirect aesthetic, aesthetics of intensity withhold nothing, and emerge in art practice as the tension between thought and action. Bassier, Ray, et al. “Speculative Realism.” Collapse, III, 2007, pp. 306–433. Beech, Amanda, et al. Speculative Aesthetics. Urbanomic, 2014. Garcia, Tristan. Life Intense: A Modern Obsession. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. Harman, Graham. “Aesthetics and the Tension in Objects.” [Met]Afourism, Midsea Books Ltd, 2018, pp. 11–19. Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Zero Books, 2011a. Harman, Graham. “The Road to Objects.” Continent, vol. 1.3, 2011b,171–179. Harman, Graham. Art and Object. Polity Press, 2019.","PeriodicalId":345481,"journal":{"name":"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No More and Less: The Withdrawal of Speculation\",\"authors\":\"J. Charlton\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/MJFAR.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the ten years since the seminal workshop on Speculative Realism at Goldsmiths College (Bassier), speculation has become the new noumenon of the art world: Promising the final fulfilment of the avant-garde dream that would finally emancipate the art object from indexicality, the speculative has held an irresistible appeal for artists (Beech, 1–2). As leader of the pack, Graham Harman’s Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) has become the champion of the cause. Yet, after all this speculation around realism, we seem to have got no closer to the real object of art than we ever where: OOO and its speculative variants, have left artists standing in the studio with nothing but a handful of sensual qualities that, as a symptom of transcendental withdrawal, are of little practical use. Speculation it seems has failed the facticity of practice and threatens to reduce art to little more than an indirect aesthetics. Anticipating the release of Harman’s Art and Object in mid 2019, this paper attempts to head off any speculative Greenbergian revitalisation by considering the implications of Tristan Garcia’s intensity with regard to the facticity of practice (Garcia, 2018). Central to Garcia’s ontology, intensity – the difference between what a thing is and what it is not – is seen to resists speculative naivety while informing practice’s need for certitude. Thus, unlike the speculative withdrawal of indirect aesthetic, aesthetics of intensity withhold nothing, and emerge in art practice as the tension between thought and action. Bassier, Ray, et al. “Speculative Realism.” Collapse, III, 2007, pp. 306–433. Beech, Amanda, et al. Speculative Aesthetics. Urbanomic, 2014. Garcia, Tristan. Life Intense: A Modern Obsession. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. Harman, Graham. “Aesthetics and the Tension in Objects.” [Met]Afourism, Midsea Books Ltd, 2018, pp. 11–19. Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Zero Books, 2011a. Harman, Graham. “The Road to Objects.” Continent, vol. 1.3, 2011b,171–179. Harman, Graham. Art and Object. Polity Press, 2019.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/MJFAR.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/MJFAR.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在金史密斯学院(Bassier)开创性的投机现实主义研讨会之后的十年里,投机已经成为艺术界的新实体:投机承诺最终实现前卫梦想,最终将艺术对象从指标性中解放出来,对艺术家们有着不可抗拒的吸引力(Beech, 1-2)。作为这一领域的领军人物,Graham Harman的面向对象本体(Object Oriented Ontology, OOO)已经成为这一领域的领军人物。然而,在对现实主义进行了所有这些猜测之后,我们似乎并没有比以往任何时候都更接近真正的艺术对象:OOO和它的推测变体,让艺术家们站在工作室里,除了一些感官品质之外什么都没有,作为先验退缩的症状,这些品质几乎没有实际用途。思辨似乎辜负了实践的真实性,并有可能将艺术贬低为一种间接的美学。预计哈曼的《艺术与对象》将于2019年年中发行,本文试图通过考虑特里斯坦·加西亚的强度对实践真实性的影响,来阻止任何猜测的格林伯格式复兴(Garcia, 2018)。在加西亚的本体论中,强度——事物是什么和它不是什么之间的区别——被视为抵制思辨的天真,同时告知实践对确定性的需要。因此,与间接美学的思辨退缩不同,强度美学不保留任何东西,并以思想与行动之间的张力出现在艺术实践中。Bassier, Ray等,<思辨现实主义>《崩溃》,2007,第306-433页。比奇,阿曼达等人。投机美学。Urbanomic, 2014年。加西亚,特里斯坦。强烈的生活:一种现代人的痴迷。爱丁堡大学出版社,2018。哈曼,格雷厄姆。美学与客体的张力。[美]《旅游》,中海图书有限公司,2018年,第11-19页。哈曼,格雷厄姆。四重物体。Zero Books, 2011。哈曼,格雷厄姆。"通向物体之路"大陆,2011年第3卷,第171-179页。哈曼,格雷厄姆。艺术与对象。政治出版社,2019。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No More and Less: The Withdrawal of Speculation
In the ten years since the seminal workshop on Speculative Realism at Goldsmiths College (Bassier), speculation has become the new noumenon of the art world: Promising the final fulfilment of the avant-garde dream that would finally emancipate the art object from indexicality, the speculative has held an irresistible appeal for artists (Beech, 1–2). As leader of the pack, Graham Harman’s Object Oriented Ontology (OOO) has become the champion of the cause. Yet, after all this speculation around realism, we seem to have got no closer to the real object of art than we ever where: OOO and its speculative variants, have left artists standing in the studio with nothing but a handful of sensual qualities that, as a symptom of transcendental withdrawal, are of little practical use. Speculation it seems has failed the facticity of practice and threatens to reduce art to little more than an indirect aesthetics. Anticipating the release of Harman’s Art and Object in mid 2019, this paper attempts to head off any speculative Greenbergian revitalisation by considering the implications of Tristan Garcia’s intensity with regard to the facticity of practice (Garcia, 2018). Central to Garcia’s ontology, intensity – the difference between what a thing is and what it is not – is seen to resists speculative naivety while informing practice’s need for certitude. Thus, unlike the speculative withdrawal of indirect aesthetic, aesthetics of intensity withhold nothing, and emerge in art practice as the tension between thought and action. Bassier, Ray, et al. “Speculative Realism.” Collapse, III, 2007, pp. 306–433. Beech, Amanda, et al. Speculative Aesthetics. Urbanomic, 2014. Garcia, Tristan. Life Intense: A Modern Obsession. Edinburgh University Press, 2018. Harman, Graham. “Aesthetics and the Tension in Objects.” [Met]Afourism, Midsea Books Ltd, 2018, pp. 11–19. Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Zero Books, 2011a. Harman, Graham. “The Road to Objects.” Continent, vol. 1.3, 2011b,171–179. Harman, Graham. Art and Object. Polity Press, 2019.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信