赫林定律的历史研究

J. Fellman
{"title":"赫林定律的历史研究","authors":"J. Fellman","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theorems, proofs, laws and rules are commonly named according to the presumed dis- coverer, but often earlier investigators have contributed substantially to the findings. One example of this is Hellin ’ s law, which was named after Hellin, although he was not the first to derive it. In research on twinning and higher multiple maternities, the law has played a central role because it is approximately correct, despite showing discrepancies that are difficult to explain or eliminate. However, most studies are based on empirical rates of multiple maternities. Such studies can only serve to identify errors too large to be characterized as random. It has been mathematically proven that Hellin ’ s law does not hold as a general rule. Consequently, improvements to this law have been proposed.","PeriodicalId":307028,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Pregnancy - New Challenges","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Studies of Hellin’s Law\",\"authors\":\"J. Fellman\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theorems, proofs, laws and rules are commonly named according to the presumed dis- coverer, but often earlier investigators have contributed substantially to the findings. One example of this is Hellin ’ s law, which was named after Hellin, although he was not the first to derive it. In research on twinning and higher multiple maternities, the law has played a central role because it is approximately correct, despite showing discrepancies that are difficult to explain or eliminate. However, most studies are based on empirical rates of multiple maternities. Such studies can only serve to identify errors too large to be characterized as random. It has been mathematically proven that Hellin ’ s law does not hold as a general rule. Consequently, improvements to this law have been proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Pregnancy - New Challenges\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Pregnancy - New Challenges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Pregnancy - New Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定理、证明、定律和规则通常是根据假定的发现者来命名的,但通常早期的研究者对这些发现作出了实质性的贡献。这方面的一个例子是赫林定律,它是以赫林的名字命名的,尽管他不是第一个推导它的人。在对双胞胎和多胞胎的研究中,该定律发挥了核心作用,因为它几乎是正确的,尽管存在难以解释或消除的差异。然而,大多数研究都是基于多次分娩的经验率。这样的研究只能用来识别太大而不能被定性为随机的误差。数学上已经证明,赫尔林定律不作为一般规则成立。因此,有人提出了对这一法律的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Studies of Hellin’s Law
Theorems, proofs, laws and rules are commonly named according to the presumed dis- coverer, but often earlier investigators have contributed substantially to the findings. One example of this is Hellin ’ s law, which was named after Hellin, although he was not the first to derive it. In research on twinning and higher multiple maternities, the law has played a central role because it is approximately correct, despite showing discrepancies that are difficult to explain or eliminate. However, most studies are based on empirical rates of multiple maternities. Such studies can only serve to identify errors too large to be characterized as random. It has been mathematically proven that Hellin ’ s law does not hold as a general rule. Consequently, improvements to this law have been proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信