可及性如何影响引用数:以ResearchGate提供的全文文章的引用为例

M. Sababi, S. Marashi, M. Pourmajidian, Sana S. Pourtabatabaei, Faezeh Darki, Mohammad Reza Sadrzadeh, Mohsen Dehghani, A. Zandieh, Mohammad Kazem Zim, Meisam Yousefi, Monire Jamalkhah, S. Tabatabaei, Fateme Safaeifard, A. Talaei, Motahareh Sobat, Faezeh Moakedi, Pouyan Nejadi
{"title":"可及性如何影响引用数:以ResearchGate提供的全文文章的引用为例","authors":"M. Sababi, S. Marashi, M. Pourmajidian, Sana S. Pourtabatabaei, Faezeh Darki, Mohammad Reza Sadrzadeh, Mohsen Dehghani, A. Zandieh, Mohammad Kazem Zim, Meisam Yousefi, Monire Jamalkhah, S. Tabatabaei, Fateme Safaeifard, A. Talaei, Motahareh Sobat, Faezeh Moakedi, Pouyan Nejadi","doi":"10.13130/2282-5398/7997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally believed that the number of citations to an article can positively be correlated to its free online availability. In the present study, we investigated the possible impact of academic social networks on the number of citations. We chose the social web service “ResearchGate” as a case. This website acts both as a social network to connect researchers, and at the same time, as an open access repository to publish post-print version of the accepted manuscripts and final versions of open access articles. We collected the data of 1823 articles published by the authors from four different universities. By analyzing these data, we showed that although different levels of full text availability are observed for the four universities, there is always a significant positive correlation between full text availability and the citation count. Moreover, we showed that both post-print version and publisher’s version (i.e., final published version) of the archived manuscripts receive more citations than non-OA articles, and the difference in the citation counts of post-print manuscripts and publisher’s version articles is nonsignificant.","PeriodicalId":296314,"journal":{"name":"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How accessibility influences citation counts: The case of citations to the full text articles available from ResearchGate\",\"authors\":\"M. Sababi, S. Marashi, M. Pourmajidian, Sana S. Pourtabatabaei, Faezeh Darki, Mohammad Reza Sadrzadeh, Mohsen Dehghani, A. Zandieh, Mohammad Kazem Zim, Meisam Yousefi, Monire Jamalkhah, S. Tabatabaei, Fateme Safaeifard, A. Talaei, Motahareh Sobat, Faezeh Moakedi, Pouyan Nejadi\",\"doi\":\"10.13130/2282-5398/7997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is generally believed that the number of citations to an article can positively be correlated to its free online availability. In the present study, we investigated the possible impact of academic social networks on the number of citations. We chose the social web service “ResearchGate” as a case. This website acts both as a social network to connect researchers, and at the same time, as an open access repository to publish post-print version of the accepted manuscripts and final versions of open access articles. We collected the data of 1823 articles published by the authors from four different universities. By analyzing these data, we showed that although different levels of full text availability are observed for the four universities, there is always a significant positive correlation between full text availability and the citation count. Moreover, we showed that both post-print version and publisher’s version (i.e., final published version) of the archived manuscripts receive more citations than non-OA articles, and the difference in the citation counts of post-print manuscripts and publisher’s version articles is nonsignificant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/7997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/7997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

人们普遍认为,一篇文章被引用的次数与它的免费在线可用性呈正相关。在本研究中,我们调查了学术社会网络对被引次数的可能影响。我们选择了社交网络服务“ResearchGate”作为案例。这个网站既是一个连接研究人员的社交网络,同时也是一个开放获取资源库,发布已接受的手稿的印刷后版本和开放获取文章的最终版本。我们收集了来自四所不同大学的作者发表的1823篇文章的数据。通过分析这些数据,我们发现尽管四所大学的全文可用性水平不同,但全文可用性与被引次数之间始终存在显著的正相关关系。此外,我们发现,归档稿件的印后版和出版版(即最终出版版)的被引次数都高于非开放获取文章,而印后版和出版版的被引次数差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How accessibility influences citation counts: The case of citations to the full text articles available from ResearchGate
It is generally believed that the number of citations to an article can positively be correlated to its free online availability. In the present study, we investigated the possible impact of academic social networks on the number of citations. We chose the social web service “ResearchGate” as a case. This website acts both as a social network to connect researchers, and at the same time, as an open access repository to publish post-print version of the accepted manuscripts and final versions of open access articles. We collected the data of 1823 articles published by the authors from four different universities. By analyzing these data, we showed that although different levels of full text availability are observed for the four universities, there is always a significant positive correlation between full text availability and the citation count. Moreover, we showed that both post-print version and publisher’s version (i.e., final published version) of the archived manuscripts receive more citations than non-OA articles, and the difference in the citation counts of post-print manuscripts and publisher’s version articles is nonsignificant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信