婚姻能长久吗?科学与人文的概念问题。

Robert P. Reno, Cynthia Thomiszer
{"title":"婚姻能长久吗?科学与人文的概念问题。","authors":"Robert P. Reno, Cynthia Thomiszer","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"studies, such as the history and philosophy of science, are older and more familiar than such areas as bio ethics, psychology of progress, and science and literature. But regardless of how old or new it may be, each area invariably shares the characteristic of being based on the wedding of two disciplines that have long been seen as separate, distinct, and perhaps even an tagonistic. The ever-growing influence of science and technology on every part of our society, however, has largely disarmed those traditionalists who would oppose","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Marriage Last? Conceptual Problems in Science and Humanities.\",\"authors\":\"Robert P. Reno, Cynthia Thomiszer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"studies, such as the history and philosophy of science, are older and more familiar than such areas as bio ethics, psychology of progress, and science and literature. But regardless of how old or new it may be, each area invariably shares the characteristic of being based on the wedding of two disciplines that have long been seen as separate, distinct, and perhaps even an tagonistic. The ever-growing influence of science and technology on every part of our society, however, has largely disarmed those traditionalists who would oppose\",\"PeriodicalId\":126898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诸如科学史和科学哲学之类的研究比生物伦理学、进步心理学、科学和文学等领域更古老,也更熟悉。但是,无论它是多么古老或新的,每个领域都有一个共同的特点,即基于两个学科的结合,这两个学科长期以来被视为是分开的,不同的,甚至可能是敌对的。然而,科学技术对我们社会各个方面日益增长的影响在很大程度上削弱了那些反对的传统主义者的武装
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the Marriage Last? Conceptual Problems in Science and Humanities.
studies, such as the history and philosophy of science, are older and more familiar than such areas as bio ethics, psychology of progress, and science and literature. But regardless of how old or new it may be, each area invariably shares the characteristic of being based on the wedding of two disciplines that have long been seen as separate, distinct, and perhaps even an tagonistic. The ever-growing influence of science and technology on every part of our society, however, has largely disarmed those traditionalists who would oppose
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信