重要的少数vs微不足道的许多:检查软件的帕累托原则

Mechelle Gittens, Y. Kim, David Godwin
{"title":"重要的少数vs微不足道的许多:检查软件的帕累托原则","authors":"Mechelle Gittens, Y. Kim, David Godwin","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the Pareto principle as it relates to the distribution of software defects in code. We look at evidence in the context of both the software test team, and users of the software. We also investigate two related principles. The first principle is that the distribution of defects in code relates to the distribution of complexity in code. The second principle is that how we define complexity relates to the distribution of defects in code. We present this work as an empirical study of three general hypotheses investigated for large production-level software; we show that the essence of the principle holds, while precise percentages do not.","PeriodicalId":419267,"journal":{"name":"29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vital few versus the trivial many: examining the Pareto principle for software\",\"authors\":\"Mechelle Gittens, Y. Kim, David Godwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the Pareto principle as it relates to the distribution of software defects in code. We look at evidence in the context of both the software test team, and users of the software. We also investigate two related principles. The first principle is that the distribution of defects in code relates to the distribution of complexity in code. The second principle is that how we define complexity relates to the distribution of defects in code. We present this work as an empirical study of three general hypotheses investigated for large production-level software; we show that the essence of the principle holds, while precise percentages do not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

本文讨论了帕累托原则,因为它与代码中软件缺陷的分布有关。我们在软件测试团队和软件用户的上下文中查看证据。我们还研究了两个相关的原则。第一个原则是代码中缺陷的分布与代码中复杂性的分布相关。第二个原则是我们如何定义复杂性与代码中缺陷的分布有关。我们将这项工作作为对大型生产级软件调查的三个一般假设的实证研究;我们表明,原则的本质是成立的,而精确的百分比则不是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The vital few versus the trivial many: examining the Pareto principle for software
This paper discusses the Pareto principle as it relates to the distribution of software defects in code. We look at evidence in the context of both the software test team, and users of the software. We also investigate two related principles. The first principle is that the distribution of defects in code relates to the distribution of complexity in code. The second principle is that how we define complexity relates to the distribution of defects in code. We present this work as an empirical study of three general hypotheses investigated for large production-level software; we show that the essence of the principle holds, while precise percentages do not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信