澄清三叶荆芥(藤科)的命名

I. Turner
{"title":"澄清三叶荆芥(藤科)的命名","authors":"I. Turner","doi":"10.3850/S2382581215000320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capparis trifoliata Roxb., the supposed basionym of ‘Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata (Roxb.) Jacobs’ and ‘Crateva trifoliata (Roxb.) B.S.Sun’, is shown to represent an illegitimate renaming of Crateva religiosa G.Forst. However, Jacobs effectively excluded the nomenclatural type of Capparis trifoliata, thus avoiding creating a superfluous name, and instead described Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata Jacobs validated by the citation of the Latin description of Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep. Sun also excluded the type of Crateva religiosa, but his effective transfer of C. adansonii subsp. trifoliata to specific rank does not have priority over Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep., which is therefore the correct name for this taxon when it is considered a distinct species. The name Crateva nurvula Buch.-Ham. is formally lectotypified.","PeriodicalId":321970,"journal":{"name":"The Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore","volume":"276 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarifying the nomenclature of Crateva trifoliata (Capparaceae)\",\"authors\":\"I. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.3850/S2382581215000320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Capparis trifoliata Roxb., the supposed basionym of ‘Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata (Roxb.) Jacobs’ and ‘Crateva trifoliata (Roxb.) B.S.Sun’, is shown to represent an illegitimate renaming of Crateva religiosa G.Forst. However, Jacobs effectively excluded the nomenclatural type of Capparis trifoliata, thus avoiding creating a superfluous name, and instead described Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata Jacobs validated by the citation of the Latin description of Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep. Sun also excluded the type of Crateva religiosa, but his effective transfer of C. adansonii subsp. trifoliata to specific rank does not have priority over Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep., which is therefore the correct name for this taxon when it is considered a distinct species. The name Crateva nurvula Buch.-Ham. is formally lectotypified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore\",\"volume\":\"276 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3850/S2382581215000320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/S2382581215000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三叶草。这就是所谓的“克拉特瓦·阿达索尼亚”的基底。trifoliata (Roxb)。雅各布斯(Jacobs)和克拉特瓦(Crateva trifoliata) (robb .)b.s.s sun’,是对克拉特瓦的非法重命名。然而,Jacobs有效地排除了Capparis trifoliata的命名类型,从而避免了创建一个多余的名称,而是描述了Crateva adansonii subsp。三叶草雅各布斯证实了引用拉丁描述的克拉特瓦红carpa Gagnep。孙也排除了天牛的类型,但他有效地转移了天牛的亚种。三叶草对特定的等级没有优先于红叶树。因此,当它被认为是一个独特的物种时,这是这个分类单元的正确名称。名字是克拉特娃·努瓦拉·布克·哈姆。是正式的lectotypized。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clarifying the nomenclature of Crateva trifoliata (Capparaceae)
Capparis trifoliata Roxb., the supposed basionym of ‘Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata (Roxb.) Jacobs’ and ‘Crateva trifoliata (Roxb.) B.S.Sun’, is shown to represent an illegitimate renaming of Crateva religiosa G.Forst. However, Jacobs effectively excluded the nomenclatural type of Capparis trifoliata, thus avoiding creating a superfluous name, and instead described Crateva adansonii subsp. trifoliata Jacobs validated by the citation of the Latin description of Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep. Sun also excluded the type of Crateva religiosa, but his effective transfer of C. adansonii subsp. trifoliata to specific rank does not have priority over Crateva erythrocarpa Gagnep., which is therefore the correct name for this taxon when it is considered a distinct species. The name Crateva nurvula Buch.-Ham. is formally lectotypified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信