S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink
{"title":"解释公民不采用电子政府服务:拉脱维亚非公共电子服务用户的研究","authors":"S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink","doi":"10.3233/IP-170069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using \nqualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses \nthe motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic \nequivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a \nhigher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience \nfactors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the \nwell-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic \ngovernment services follow.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia\",\"authors\":\"S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/IP-170069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using \\nqualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses \\nthe motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic \\nequivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a \\nhigher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience \\nfactors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the \\nwell-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic \\ngovernment services follow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Polity\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia
This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using
qualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses
the motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic
equivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a
higher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience
factors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the
well-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic
government services follow.