{"title":"使用QoS参数进行快速仲裁的流量管理机制","authors":"P. Golla, G. Damm, Timuçin Özugur","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration between various contenders using given priority parameters is difficult to implement in hardware. We present a solution that solves this problem with minimal hardware. The solution presented is simple, fair, starvation-free, and fast. A contention resolving technique, called binary tree arbitration, is taken as a basis for implementing a \"weighted fair\" contention resolution technique that picks among \"n\" contenders, which could translate to flows, packets/cells, or connections. The extensions are priority and embedded binary tree arbitrations. Theoretical formulations of these techniques are presented. The results of their comparisons to software and hardware simulations, to show their relative conformance, are also presented.","PeriodicalId":301154,"journal":{"name":"GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traffic management mechanism for fast arbitrations with QoS parameters\",\"authors\":\"P. Golla, G. Damm, Timuçin Özugur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbitration between various contenders using given priority parameters is difficult to implement in hardware. We present a solution that solves this problem with minimal hardware. The solution presented is simple, fair, starvation-free, and fast. A contention resolving technique, called binary tree arbitration, is taken as a basis for implementing a \\\"weighted fair\\\" contention resolution technique that picks among \\\"n\\\" contenders, which could translate to flows, packets/cells, or connections. The extensions are priority and embedded binary tree arbitrations. Theoretical formulations of these techniques are presented. The results of their comparisons to software and hardware simulations, to show their relative conformance, are also presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)\",\"volume\":\"218 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Traffic management mechanism for fast arbitrations with QoS parameters
Arbitration between various contenders using given priority parameters is difficult to implement in hardware. We present a solution that solves this problem with minimal hardware. The solution presented is simple, fair, starvation-free, and fast. A contention resolving technique, called binary tree arbitration, is taken as a basis for implementing a "weighted fair" contention resolution technique that picks among "n" contenders, which could translate to flows, packets/cells, or connections. The extensions are priority and embedded binary tree arbitrations. Theoretical formulations of these techniques are presented. The results of their comparisons to software and hardware simulations, to show their relative conformance, are also presented.