高校网络学习课程满意度分析

Young-Dong Moon
{"title":"高校网络学习课程满意度分析","authors":"Young-Dong Moon","doi":"10.24203/ajhss.v8i5.6340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"--This study, therefore, aims to propose a direction for the future e-learning class, by analyzing the satisfaction with e-learning class. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. From the findings above, following suggestions for the quality improvement of e-learning class in general universities can be summarized: First, it needs to prioritize the establishment of stable and available e-learning systems in schools. Second, professors should quickly adapt to e-learning class, a new paradigm of education. Third, student should primarily acquire basic abilities to use computers, recognize that self-directed learning is the core of university education and make effort to escape from learning by rote, which had been conducted from elementary to high schools. In addition, they should reasonably judge what a method is desirable for enhancing their learning performance. Keywords----e-learning, Class satisfaction _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. I. NECESSITY OF STUDY As the world greets the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution, new changes are taking place in the society at large. The educational field is no exception, because it is called for a new educational paradigm and is pursuing change. Under such circumstances, every sector of society was forced into an untact, online or home-based environment for studying and working due to the COVID-19, which caused a global pandemic in 2020. Now, coping with these situations is no longer a matter of choice but an essential, and is even becoming the only way of survival. Universities, in particular, are facing a transition period, having to break away from the existing high-cost educational system based on physical campus and adopt an educational paradigm that effectively responds to globalization and informatization (Jeong & Jeon, 2002). They have to take on a new challenge of assuming the responsibility of e-learning education because of the unexpected war against virus. E-learning education breaks away from the existing classroom classes that are carried out face-to-face: It can be described as a personalized educational environment in which students learn at the time and place they want. E-learning education utilizes the advantages of technology to facilitate the application of information using multimedia, learner-centered learning, sharing of information and resources, and updating of information or data, and thereby enables education applying various teaching-learning methods (Kang, 2002). However, many universities are shoved to implement e-learning classes without preparation, giving rise to intense dissatisfaction among students because of poor learning content and insufficient technical support. Despite this situation, there is very little empirical research on this matter. Therefore, this study aims to determine what aspects are found satisfactory among students even under the poor environment and what their ultimate expectations are, drawing basic research results for quick solutions to the current problem, and to suggest the direction of future e-learning classes. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. e-learning According to Article 2 (Definitions) of the Act on Development of E-learning Industry and Promotion of Utilization of Elearning (partially amended on October 31, 2017), e-learning is stipulated as 'learning by means of electronic tools, information and communications, electric wave or broadcasting technology.’ In the field of education engineering, the concept of e-learning is defined as ‘an educational training method where learners lead the learning goals and methods for themselves using information and communication technology’ or as ‘a series of learning activities that restructure digitalized learning contents into a learner’s cognitive structure in a network-based environment’ (Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy et al., 2005). Until now, the concept of e-learning have been used with various terms, among which the most common ones are online education, virtual education, cyber education, internet-based education, web-based education, web-based learning, distance Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 162 education, online education, and e-learning (Lee, 2002:15). Accordingly, this study uses the term e-learning, which is widely used most recently. 2.2. Previous studies on learning satisfaction of e-learning Research related to e-learning began in the 1980s, when the computer communication system started to be fully utilized in educational setting, and mainly aimed at identifying the factors that influence the learning effects e-learning. Among studies related to learning satisfaction, which is relevant to this study, the following studies were frequently cited in subsequent studies. Jae-sam Jung and Gyu-Yeon Lim (2000) are a study to find out the main factors related to learner's participation, achievement, and satisfaction in web-based discussion. appear. Choi Kwang-shin and Noh Jin-deok (2002) examined various factors that affect student satisfaction, and in particular, in e-learning classes, like face-to-face classes, suggested that interaction with instructors should be activated in various ways to increase learning satisfaction. . In-Keun Jung and Jo Jung-Yong (2004) studied e-learning and the relationship formation between learners, and this study particularly emphasized the moderating effect of learning patterns. Based on the above-mentioned previous studies, it can be stated that learning satisfaction and outcome from e-learning depend on various factors, which mainly consist of personal and system-related matters. Because the intended subjects of this study were not students of cyber universities that are equipped with e-learning facilities but students attending general universities that implemented e-learning classes without preparation due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, this study focused on a preliminary research exploring the meaning of respective factors and the relationship between factors rather than clarifying the specific factors that influence learning satisfaction of elearning. 3. METHODS AND RESULTS 3.1. Methods This study conducted the satisfaction test which the researcher created by sincerely translating the test kit that Lee Seongju and Gwang Jaehwan(2011) used in their thesis and adjusted it to the actual Korean universities by consulting three professionals. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. 3.2. Results 3.2.1 Frequency Analysis The distribution of the subjects was examined to find that the ratio of female(68.1%) was higher than that of males and the ratio of the subjects under 29 was highest(85.7%). Compared with students in other universities, the ratio of those older than 60 accounted for as high as 9.9% in the university. Since such old people were not skilled at computers, it may be possible to predict their difficulty in entering e-learning class. In addition, most of students(n=82) marked middle or low, in a scale of their computer skills. Contrary to our expectations, there are students(5.28%) who have not experienced elearning class. On the other hand, students responded that lecture (52.7%) and assignment(29.7%) were useful class, while the ratio of those, who responded that debate which were often used in class was useful, was relatively low (2.2%). This result should be considered when the future class is organized. In addition, 53 students responded that the class time less than 30 minutes was proper, while 38 students responded that the class time of 30 minutes-1 hour was adequate, compared with face-toface class, indicating no significant difference between them. To the question, 'whether teaching methods were appropriate', the highest ratio of students(42.9%) responded 'yes'. To the question about the stability of systems, the highest ratio of them48.4% responded that it was moderate. To the question about the convenience of systems, the highest ratio of students(39,7%) responded that they were convenient. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 163 Table 1: Frequency Analysis division Frequency Percentage(%) Gender Male 29 31.9 Female 62 68.1 Age Under 29 78 85.7 30-39 3 3.3 40-59 1 1.1 Over 60 9 9.9 Computer level High level 9 9.9 middle level 47 51.6 low level 35 38.5 E-learning class experience have 43 47.2","PeriodicalId":184745,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Satisfaction of University e-Learning Classes\",\"authors\":\"Young-Dong Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.24203/ajhss.v8i5.6340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"--This study, therefore, aims to propose a direction for the future e-learning class, by analyzing the satisfaction with e-learning class. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. From the findings above, following suggestions for the quality improvement of e-learning class in general universities can be summarized: First, it needs to prioritize the establishment of stable and available e-learning systems in schools. Second, professors should quickly adapt to e-learning class, a new paradigm of education. Third, student should primarily acquire basic abilities to use computers, recognize that self-directed learning is the core of university education and make effort to escape from learning by rote, which had been conducted from elementary to high schools. In addition, they should reasonably judge what a method is desirable for enhancing their learning performance. Keywords----e-learning, Class satisfaction _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. I. NECESSITY OF STUDY As the world greets the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution, new changes are taking place in the society at large. The educational field is no exception, because it is called for a new educational paradigm and is pursuing change. Under such circumstances, every sector of society was forced into an untact, online or home-based environment for studying and working due to the COVID-19, which caused a global pandemic in 2020. Now, coping with these situations is no longer a matter of choice but an essential, and is even becoming the only way of survival. Universities, in particular, are facing a transition period, having to break away from the existing high-cost educational system based on physical campus and adopt an educational paradigm that effectively responds to globalization and informatization (Jeong & Jeon, 2002). They have to take on a new challenge of assuming the responsibility of e-learning education because of the unexpected war against virus. E-learning education breaks away from the existing classroom classes that are carried out face-to-face: It can be described as a personalized educational environment in which students learn at the time and place they want. E-learning education utilizes the advantages of technology to facilitate the application of information using multimedia, learner-centered learning, sharing of information and resources, and updating of information or data, and thereby enables education applying various teaching-learning methods (Kang, 2002). However, many universities are shoved to implement e-learning classes without preparation, giving rise to intense dissatisfaction among students because of poor learning content and insufficient technical support. Despite this situation, there is very little empirical research on this matter. Therefore, this study aims to determine what aspects are found satisfactory among students even under the poor environment and what their ultimate expectations are, drawing basic research results for quick solutions to the current problem, and to suggest the direction of future e-learning classes. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. e-learning According to Article 2 (Definitions) of the Act on Development of E-learning Industry and Promotion of Utilization of Elearning (partially amended on October 31, 2017), e-learning is stipulated as 'learning by means of electronic tools, information and communications, electric wave or broadcasting technology.’ In the field of education engineering, the concept of e-learning is defined as ‘an educational training method where learners lead the learning goals and methods for themselves using information and communication technology’ or as ‘a series of learning activities that restructure digitalized learning contents into a learner’s cognitive structure in a network-based environment’ (Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy et al., 2005). Until now, the concept of e-learning have been used with various terms, among which the most common ones are online education, virtual education, cyber education, internet-based education, web-based education, web-based learning, distance Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 162 education, online education, and e-learning (Lee, 2002:15). Accordingly, this study uses the term e-learning, which is widely used most recently. 2.2. Previous studies on learning satisfaction of e-learning Research related to e-learning began in the 1980s, when the computer communication system started to be fully utilized in educational setting, and mainly aimed at identifying the factors that influence the learning effects e-learning. Among studies related to learning satisfaction, which is relevant to this study, the following studies were frequently cited in subsequent studies. Jae-sam Jung and Gyu-Yeon Lim (2000) are a study to find out the main factors related to learner's participation, achievement, and satisfaction in web-based discussion. appear. Choi Kwang-shin and Noh Jin-deok (2002) examined various factors that affect student satisfaction, and in particular, in e-learning classes, like face-to-face classes, suggested that interaction with instructors should be activated in various ways to increase learning satisfaction. . In-Keun Jung and Jo Jung-Yong (2004) studied e-learning and the relationship formation between learners, and this study particularly emphasized the moderating effect of learning patterns. Based on the above-mentioned previous studies, it can be stated that learning satisfaction and outcome from e-learning depend on various factors, which mainly consist of personal and system-related matters. Because the intended subjects of this study were not students of cyber universities that are equipped with e-learning facilities but students attending general universities that implemented e-learning classes without preparation due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, this study focused on a preliminary research exploring the meaning of respective factors and the relationship between factors rather than clarifying the specific factors that influence learning satisfaction of elearning. 3. METHODS AND RESULTS 3.1. Methods This study conducted the satisfaction test which the researcher created by sincerely translating the test kit that Lee Seongju and Gwang Jaehwan(2011) used in their thesis and adjusted it to the actual Korean universities by consulting three professionals. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. 3.2. Results 3.2.1 Frequency Analysis The distribution of the subjects was examined to find that the ratio of female(68.1%) was higher than that of males and the ratio of the subjects under 29 was highest(85.7%). Compared with students in other universities, the ratio of those older than 60 accounted for as high as 9.9% in the university. Since such old people were not skilled at computers, it may be possible to predict their difficulty in entering e-learning class. In addition, most of students(n=82) marked middle or low, in a scale of their computer skills. Contrary to our expectations, there are students(5.28%) who have not experienced elearning class. On the other hand, students responded that lecture (52.7%) and assignment(29.7%) were useful class, while the ratio of those, who responded that debate which were often used in class was useful, was relatively low (2.2%). This result should be considered when the future class is organized. In addition, 53 students responded that the class time less than 30 minutes was proper, while 38 students responded that the class time of 30 minutes-1 hour was adequate, compared with face-toface class, indicating no significant difference between them. To the question, 'whether teaching methods were appropriate', the highest ratio of students(42.9%) responded 'yes'. To the question about the stability of systems, the highest ratio of them48.4% responded that it was moderate. To the question about the convenience of systems, the highest ratio of students(39,7%) responded that they were convenient. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 163 Table 1: Frequency Analysis division Frequency Percentage(%) Gender Male 29 31.9 Female 62 68.1 Age Under 29 78 85.7 30-39 3 3.3 40-59 1 1.1 Over 60 9 9.9 Computer level High level 9 9.9 middle level 47 51.6 low level 35 38.5 E-learning class experience have 43 47.2\",\"PeriodicalId\":184745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajhss.v8i5.6340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajhss.v8i5.6340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

——因此,本研究旨在通过对电子学习课程满意度的分析,为未来的电子学习课程提出一个方向。另外,从2020年6月22日到6月30日,对首尔地区的96名大学新生进行了问卷调查,共使用92份问卷进行了最终分析。综上所述,对于普通高校e-learning课堂的质量提升,可以总结出以下几点建议:第一,需要优先在学校建立稳定、可用的e-learning系统。第二,教授应该迅速适应电子学习课程,这是一种新的教育模式。第三,学生应该首先掌握基本的计算机使用能力,认识到自主学习是大学教育的核心,努力摆脱从小学到高中的死记硬背的学习方式。此外,他们应该合理地判断什么样的方法是可取的,以提高他们的学习成绩。关键字——在线学习,课的满意度 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1。随着世界进入第四次工业革命时代,整个社会正在发生新的变化。教育领域也不例外,因为它需要一种新的教育范式,并正在追求变革。在这种情况下,由于2020年全球大流行的新冠肺炎疫情,社会各界被迫进入非接触、在线或在家学习和工作的环境。现在,应对这些情况不再是一个选择的问题,而是一个必要的,甚至是唯一的生存方式。尤其是大学,正面临着一个转型期,必须摆脱现有的基于实体校园的高成本教育体系,采用一种有效应对全球化和信息化的教育范式(Jeong & Jeon, 2002)。一场突如其来的病毒攻防战,让他们不得不承担起网络教育的重任。E-learning教育脱离了现有的面对面的课堂教学,它可以被描述为一种个性化的教育环境,学生可以在他们想要的时间和地点学习。E-learning教育利用技术的优势,利用多媒体促进信息的应用,以学习者为中心的学习,信息和资源的共享,信息或数据的更新,从而使教育应用多种教学方法(Kang, 2002)。然而,许多大学在没有准备的情况下被迫实施电子学习课程,由于学习内容差,技术支持不足,引起了学生的强烈不满。尽管如此,关于这一问题的实证研究却很少。因此,本研究旨在确定在恶劣的环境下,学生在哪些方面是满意的,他们的最终期望是什么,得出基础的研究结果,以便快速解决当前的问题,并为未来的e-learning课堂提出方向。2. 文献综述根据2017年10月31日部分修订的“电子学习产业发展及促进电子学习利用法”第2条(定义),电子学习被规定为“利用电子工具、信息通信、电波或广播技术进行学习”。在教育工程领域,e-learning的概念被定义为“学习者利用信息和通信技术为自己主导学习目标和方法的一种教育培训方法”或“在基于网络的环境中,将数字化学习内容重构为学习者认知结构的一系列学习活动”(Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy et al., 2005)。到目前为止,电子学习的概念已经有了各种各样的术语,其中最常见的是在线教育,虚拟教育,网络教育,基于互联网的教育,基于网络的学习,远程亚洲人文社会研究杂志(ISSN: 2321 2799)第8卷-第5期,2020年10月亚洲在线期刊(www.ajouronline.com) 162教育,在线教育和电子学习(Lee, 2002:15)。因此,本研究使用了最近被广泛使用的术语e-learning。2.2. 以往关于e-learning学习满意度的研究始于20世纪80年代,当时计算机通信系统开始在教育环境中得到充分利用,主要目的是识别影响e-learning学习效果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Satisfaction of University e-Learning Classes
--This study, therefore, aims to propose a direction for the future e-learning class, by analyzing the satisfaction with e-learning class. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. From the findings above, following suggestions for the quality improvement of e-learning class in general universities can be summarized: First, it needs to prioritize the establishment of stable and available e-learning systems in schools. Second, professors should quickly adapt to e-learning class, a new paradigm of education. Third, student should primarily acquire basic abilities to use computers, recognize that self-directed learning is the core of university education and make effort to escape from learning by rote, which had been conducted from elementary to high schools. In addition, they should reasonably judge what a method is desirable for enhancing their learning performance. Keywords----e-learning, Class satisfaction _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. I. NECESSITY OF STUDY As the world greets the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution, new changes are taking place in the society at large. The educational field is no exception, because it is called for a new educational paradigm and is pursuing change. Under such circumstances, every sector of society was forced into an untact, online or home-based environment for studying and working due to the COVID-19, which caused a global pandemic in 2020. Now, coping with these situations is no longer a matter of choice but an essential, and is even becoming the only way of survival. Universities, in particular, are facing a transition period, having to break away from the existing high-cost educational system based on physical campus and adopt an educational paradigm that effectively responds to globalization and informatization (Jeong & Jeon, 2002). They have to take on a new challenge of assuming the responsibility of e-learning education because of the unexpected war against virus. E-learning education breaks away from the existing classroom classes that are carried out face-to-face: It can be described as a personalized educational environment in which students learn at the time and place they want. E-learning education utilizes the advantages of technology to facilitate the application of information using multimedia, learner-centered learning, sharing of information and resources, and updating of information or data, and thereby enables education applying various teaching-learning methods (Kang, 2002). However, many universities are shoved to implement e-learning classes without preparation, giving rise to intense dissatisfaction among students because of poor learning content and insufficient technical support. Despite this situation, there is very little empirical research on this matter. Therefore, this study aims to determine what aspects are found satisfactory among students even under the poor environment and what their ultimate expectations are, drawing basic research results for quick solutions to the current problem, and to suggest the direction of future e-learning classes. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. e-learning According to Article 2 (Definitions) of the Act on Development of E-learning Industry and Promotion of Utilization of Elearning (partially amended on October 31, 2017), e-learning is stipulated as 'learning by means of electronic tools, information and communications, electric wave or broadcasting technology.’ In the field of education engineering, the concept of e-learning is defined as ‘an educational training method where learners lead the learning goals and methods for themselves using information and communication technology’ or as ‘a series of learning activities that restructure digitalized learning contents into a learner’s cognitive structure in a network-based environment’ (Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy et al., 2005). Until now, the concept of e-learning have been used with various terms, among which the most common ones are online education, virtual education, cyber education, internet-based education, web-based education, web-based learning, distance Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 162 education, online education, and e-learning (Lee, 2002:15). Accordingly, this study uses the term e-learning, which is widely used most recently. 2.2. Previous studies on learning satisfaction of e-learning Research related to e-learning began in the 1980s, when the computer communication system started to be fully utilized in educational setting, and mainly aimed at identifying the factors that influence the learning effects e-learning. Among studies related to learning satisfaction, which is relevant to this study, the following studies were frequently cited in subsequent studies. Jae-sam Jung and Gyu-Yeon Lim (2000) are a study to find out the main factors related to learner's participation, achievement, and satisfaction in web-based discussion. appear. Choi Kwang-shin and Noh Jin-deok (2002) examined various factors that affect student satisfaction, and in particular, in e-learning classes, like face-to-face classes, suggested that interaction with instructors should be activated in various ways to increase learning satisfaction. . In-Keun Jung and Jo Jung-Yong (2004) studied e-learning and the relationship formation between learners, and this study particularly emphasized the moderating effect of learning patterns. Based on the above-mentioned previous studies, it can be stated that learning satisfaction and outcome from e-learning depend on various factors, which mainly consist of personal and system-related matters. Because the intended subjects of this study were not students of cyber universities that are equipped with e-learning facilities but students attending general universities that implemented e-learning classes without preparation due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, this study focused on a preliminary research exploring the meaning of respective factors and the relationship between factors rather than clarifying the specific factors that influence learning satisfaction of elearning. 3. METHODS AND RESULTS 3.1. Methods This study conducted the satisfaction test which the researcher created by sincerely translating the test kit that Lee Seongju and Gwang Jaehwan(2011) used in their thesis and adjusted it to the actual Korean universities by consulting three professionals. It also administered questionnaires to 96 freshmen at universities located in Seoul, from Jun. 22 to Jun. 30, 2020, and used a total of 92 copies in the finally analysis. 3.2. Results 3.2.1 Frequency Analysis The distribution of the subjects was examined to find that the ratio of female(68.1%) was higher than that of males and the ratio of the subjects under 29 was highest(85.7%). Compared with students in other universities, the ratio of those older than 60 accounted for as high as 9.9% in the university. Since such old people were not skilled at computers, it may be possible to predict their difficulty in entering e-learning class. In addition, most of students(n=82) marked middle or low, in a scale of their computer skills. Contrary to our expectations, there are students(5.28%) who have not experienced elearning class. On the other hand, students responded that lecture (52.7%) and assignment(29.7%) were useful class, while the ratio of those, who responded that debate which were often used in class was useful, was relatively low (2.2%). This result should be considered when the future class is organized. In addition, 53 students responded that the class time less than 30 minutes was proper, while 38 students responded that the class time of 30 minutes-1 hour was adequate, compared with face-toface class, indicating no significant difference between them. To the question, 'whether teaching methods were appropriate', the highest ratio of students(42.9%) responded 'yes'. To the question about the stability of systems, the highest ratio of them48.4% responded that it was moderate. To the question about the convenience of systems, the highest ratio of students(39,7%) responded that they were convenient. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 2799) Volume 8– Issue 5, October 2020 Asian Online Journals (www.ajouronline.com) 163 Table 1: Frequency Analysis division Frequency Percentage(%) Gender Male 29 31.9 Female 62 68.1 Age Under 29 78 85.7 30-39 3 3.3 40-59 1 1.1 Over 60 9 9.9 Computer level High level 9 9.9 middle level 47 51.6 low level 35 38.5 E-learning class experience have 43 47.2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信