血管内技术治疗颅内大动脉瘤的长期随访:来自印度一家三级护理神经外科研究所的经验

Gautam Dutta, D. Mahajan, Daljit Singh, A. Jagetia, Hukum Singh, A. Srivastava
{"title":"血管内技术治疗颅内大动脉瘤的长期随访:来自印度一家三级护理神经外科研究所的经验","authors":"Gautam Dutta, D. Mahajan, Daljit Singh, A. Jagetia, Hukum Singh, A. Srivastava","doi":"10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_18_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We present our experience of managing large and giant intracranial aneurysms by conventional endovascular techniques. We discuss the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coiling of these aneurysms. Materials and Methods: We assessed a prospectively maintained database of patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by the endovascular techniques from January 2010 to December 2014. In 412 patients with 468 aneurysms managed during this period, 58 patients with 60 aneurysms were identified as either large or giant. Each patient's records were reviewed with regard to size, location and morphology of the aneurysms, Hunt and Hess grade, occlusion and coiling/recoiling rates. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score with score of 0–2 and 3–6 taken as favourable and unfavourable outcome, respectively. Results: Overall complication rate was 13.8%, and no intraprocedural death was seen. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was available for 49 patients with 49 aneurysms at an average of 28.7 months. Recanalisation rate was 26.5% in this study and of them 38.5% required retreatment. Favourable mRS score (0–2) was seen in 82.6% of ruptured aneurysms and 92.3% in unruptured aneurysms. Conclusion: Coiling of large and giant aneurysms is a safe and viable option with a very good clinical outcome in the long run. However, long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up is necessary as angiographic results immediately after the procedure may be deceptive.","PeriodicalId":218723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term follow-up of large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by endovascular techniques: Experience from a tertiary care neurosurgery institute in India\",\"authors\":\"Gautam Dutta, D. Mahajan, Daljit Singh, A. Jagetia, Hukum Singh, A. Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_18_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: We present our experience of managing large and giant intracranial aneurysms by conventional endovascular techniques. We discuss the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coiling of these aneurysms. Materials and Methods: We assessed a prospectively maintained database of patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by the endovascular techniques from January 2010 to December 2014. In 412 patients with 468 aneurysms managed during this period, 58 patients with 60 aneurysms were identified as either large or giant. Each patient's records were reviewed with regard to size, location and morphology of the aneurysms, Hunt and Hess grade, occlusion and coiling/recoiling rates. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score with score of 0–2 and 3–6 taken as favourable and unfavourable outcome, respectively. Results: Overall complication rate was 13.8%, and no intraprocedural death was seen. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was available for 49 patients with 49 aneurysms at an average of 28.7 months. Recanalisation rate was 26.5% in this study and of them 38.5% required retreatment. Favourable mRS score (0–2) was seen in 82.6% of ruptured aneurysms and 92.3% in unruptured aneurysms. Conclusion: Coiling of large and giant aneurysms is a safe and viable option with a very good clinical outcome in the long run. However, long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up is necessary as angiographic results immediately after the procedure may be deceptive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_18_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebrovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvs.jcvs_18_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们介绍了常规血管内技术治疗颅内大动脉瘤的经验。我们讨论这些动脉瘤卷曲的长期临床和血管造影结果。材料和方法:我们对2010年1月至2014年12月采用血管内技术治疗的颅内大动脉瘤患者的前瞻性数据库进行了评估。在这段时间内,412名患者的468个动脉瘤中,58名患者的60个动脉瘤被确定为大或巨。回顾每位患者的记录,包括动脉瘤的大小、位置和形态、Hunt和Hess分级、闭塞和卷曲/后坐率。临床结果采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,0-2分为有利结果,3-6分为不利结果。结果:总并发症发生率为13.8%,无术中死亡病例。49例动脉瘤患者49个,平均随访28.7个月。本研究再通率为26.5%,其中38.5%需要再治疗。82.6%的破裂动脉瘤和92.3%的未破裂动脉瘤的mRS评分为0-2分。结论:大、巨动脉瘤卷取术是一种安全可行的治疗方法,长期疗效良好。然而,长期的临床和血管造影随访是必要的,因为手术后立即的血管造影结果可能具有欺骗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term follow-up of large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by endovascular techniques: Experience from a tertiary care neurosurgery institute in India
Introduction: We present our experience of managing large and giant intracranial aneurysms by conventional endovascular techniques. We discuss the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of coiling of these aneurysms. Materials and Methods: We assessed a prospectively maintained database of patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms managed by the endovascular techniques from January 2010 to December 2014. In 412 patients with 468 aneurysms managed during this period, 58 patients with 60 aneurysms were identified as either large or giant. Each patient's records were reviewed with regard to size, location and morphology of the aneurysms, Hunt and Hess grade, occlusion and coiling/recoiling rates. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score with score of 0–2 and 3–6 taken as favourable and unfavourable outcome, respectively. Results: Overall complication rate was 13.8%, and no intraprocedural death was seen. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was available for 49 patients with 49 aneurysms at an average of 28.7 months. Recanalisation rate was 26.5% in this study and of them 38.5% required retreatment. Favourable mRS score (0–2) was seen in 82.6% of ruptured aneurysms and 92.3% in unruptured aneurysms. Conclusion: Coiling of large and giant aneurysms is a safe and viable option with a very good clinical outcome in the long run. However, long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up is necessary as angiographic results immediately after the procedure may be deceptive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信