从网络中稀释的宪法问题到元法的构建

R. Negócio
{"title":"从网络中稀释的宪法问题到元法的构建","authors":"R. Negócio","doi":"10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v17n115791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The provision of services of the company Meta through its platforms has become increasingly complex, raising normative answers to legal problems that have multiplied due to this complexity. Under this scenario, this paper aims to answer how the platform deals with problems of (trans)constitutional nature and how the demand for legal formality and legal clarity in content moderations has turned the platform into a transnational legal order. To accomplish what is proposed, the method of approach used was deductive. By and large, the main conclusions point to the fact that, although there is no single legal order on the internet, there are several normative orders. Facebook is just one among many normative orders that deals with different dimensions of legal-constitutional problems such as the semantics of society or its systemic nature. With the creation of the Oversight Board, there is a tendence to have a center stage in the legal","PeriodicalId":321368,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direito Mackenzie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOS PROBLEMAS CONSTITUCIONAIS DILUÍDOS NA REDE À CONSTRUÇÃO DE UMA LEX META\",\"authors\":\"R. Negócio\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v17n115791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The provision of services of the company Meta through its platforms has become increasingly complex, raising normative answers to legal problems that have multiplied due to this complexity. Under this scenario, this paper aims to answer how the platform deals with problems of (trans)constitutional nature and how the demand for legal formality and legal clarity in content moderations has turned the platform into a transnational legal order. To accomplish what is proposed, the method of approach used was deductive. By and large, the main conclusions point to the fact that, although there is no single legal order on the internet, there are several normative orders. Facebook is just one among many normative orders that deals with different dimensions of legal-constitutional problems such as the semantics of society or its systemic nature. With the creation of the Oversight Board, there is a tendence to have a center stage in the legal\",\"PeriodicalId\":321368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Direito Mackenzie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Direito Mackenzie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v17n115791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direito Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v17n115791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

: Meta公司通过其平台提供的服务变得越来越复杂,对由于这种复杂性而成倍增加的法律问题提出了规范的答案。在这种情况下,本文旨在回答该平台如何处理(跨)宪法性质的问题,以及内容审核中对法律形式和法律清晰度的需求如何将该平台转变为跨国法律秩序。为了完成所提出的,所使用的方法是演绎法。总的来说,主要结论指出了这样一个事实:尽管互联网上没有单一的法律秩序,但有几种规范秩序。Facebook只是众多规范秩序中的一种,这些规范秩序处理法律宪法问题的不同维度,如社会语义或其系统性质。随着监督委员会的成立,出现了在法律事务中占据中心位置的趋势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DOS PROBLEMAS CONSTITUCIONAIS DILUÍDOS NA REDE À CONSTRUÇÃO DE UMA LEX META
: The provision of services of the company Meta through its platforms has become increasingly complex, raising normative answers to legal problems that have multiplied due to this complexity. Under this scenario, this paper aims to answer how the platform deals with problems of (trans)constitutional nature and how the demand for legal formality and legal clarity in content moderations has turned the platform into a transnational legal order. To accomplish what is proposed, the method of approach used was deductive. By and large, the main conclusions point to the fact that, although there is no single legal order on the internet, there are several normative orders. Facebook is just one among many normative orders that deals with different dimensions of legal-constitutional problems such as the semantics of society or its systemic nature. With the creation of the Oversight Board, there is a tendence to have a center stage in the legal
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信