跨学科和浓缩知识

Christoph Schenker
{"title":"跨学科和浓缩知识","authors":"Christoph Schenker","doi":"10.4472/9783035802108.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Everyone calls for it, but knows what the subject matter of this call really is—transdisciplinarity. After a period in which it went from an academic invitation to a urgently to be fulfilled, the has recently losing its to approach the concept anew and in a new form. This volume collects prominent voices in the debate on transdisciplinarity in a transdisciplinary manner. Its coincidence of content and form in presenting main papers and critical replies to them from a different discipline allows for a vivid discussion and new insights. These stylistically and thematically divergent contributions are linked by reservations about transdisciplinarity as an allround intellectual weapon and the conviction that its programmatic weight could be regained by approaching the subject from the margins—transdisciplinarity where it breaks down, fails, comes to an end. Unravelling transdisciplinarity’s contours by clarifying its limits.","PeriodicalId":206000,"journal":{"name":"Between / Beyond / Hybrid","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdisciplinarity and Condensed Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Schenker\",\"doi\":\"10.4472/9783035802108.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Everyone calls for it, but knows what the subject matter of this call really is—transdisciplinarity. After a period in which it went from an academic invitation to a urgently to be fulfilled, the has recently losing its to approach the concept anew and in a new form. This volume collects prominent voices in the debate on transdisciplinarity in a transdisciplinary manner. Its coincidence of content and form in presenting main papers and critical replies to them from a different discipline allows for a vivid discussion and new insights. These stylistically and thematically divergent contributions are linked by reservations about transdisciplinarity as an allround intellectual weapon and the conviction that its programmatic weight could be regained by approaching the subject from the margins—transdisciplinarity where it breaks down, fails, comes to an end. Unravelling transdisciplinarity’s contours by clarifying its limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Between / Beyond / Hybrid\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Between / Beyond / Hybrid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4472/9783035802108.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Between / Beyond / Hybrid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4472/9783035802108.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每个人都呼吁这样做,但都知道这种呼吁的真正主题是什么——跨学科。在一段时间里,它从一个学术邀请变成了一个迫切需要实现的目标,最近它失去了以一种新的形式重新对待这个概念的能力。本卷以跨学科的方式收集了跨学科辩论中突出的声音。它的内容和形式在呈现主要论文和来自不同学科的批判性回复时的一致性允许生动的讨论和新的见解。这些风格和主题上不同的贡献与对跨学科作为一种全面的智力武器的保留意见有关,并且相信通过从边缘接近主题可以重新获得其纲论性的重量-跨学科在那里它崩溃,失败,走向终结。通过澄清其局限性来揭开跨学科的轮廓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transdisciplinarity and Condensed Knowledge
Everyone calls for it, but knows what the subject matter of this call really is—transdisciplinarity. After a period in which it went from an academic invitation to a urgently to be fulfilled, the has recently losing its to approach the concept anew and in a new form. This volume collects prominent voices in the debate on transdisciplinarity in a transdisciplinary manner. Its coincidence of content and form in presenting main papers and critical replies to them from a different discipline allows for a vivid discussion and new insights. These stylistically and thematically divergent contributions are linked by reservations about transdisciplinarity as an allround intellectual weapon and the conviction that its programmatic weight could be regained by approaching the subject from the margins—transdisciplinarity where it breaks down, fails, comes to an end. Unravelling transdisciplinarity’s contours by clarifying its limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信