连续空间上离散非线性系统的Kullback-Leibler控制

Kaito Ito, K. Kashima
{"title":"连续空间上离散非线性系统的Kullback-Leibler控制","authors":"Kaito Ito, K. Kashima","doi":"10.1080/18824889.2022.2095827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kullback–Leibler (KL) control enables efficient numerical methods for nonlinear optimal control problems. The crucial assumption of KL control is the full controllability of transition distributions. However, this assumption is often violated when the dynamics evolves in a continuous space. Consequently, applying KL control to problems with continuous spaces requires some approximation, which leads to the loss of the optimality. To avoid such an approximation, in this paper, we reformulate the KL control problem for continuous spaces so that it does not require unrealistic assumptions. The key difference between the original and reformulated KL control is that the former measures the control effort by the KL divergence between controlled and uncontrolled transition distributions while the latter replaces the uncontrolled transition by a noise-driven transition. We show that the reformulated KL control admits efficient numerical algorithms like the original one without unreasonable assumptions. Specifically, the associated value function can be computed by using a Monte Carlo method based on its path integral representation.","PeriodicalId":413922,"journal":{"name":"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kullback–Leibler control for discrete-time nonlinear systems on continuous spaces\",\"authors\":\"Kaito Ito, K. Kashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18824889.2022.2095827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kullback–Leibler (KL) control enables efficient numerical methods for nonlinear optimal control problems. The crucial assumption of KL control is the full controllability of transition distributions. However, this assumption is often violated when the dynamics evolves in a continuous space. Consequently, applying KL control to problems with continuous spaces requires some approximation, which leads to the loss of the optimality. To avoid such an approximation, in this paper, we reformulate the KL control problem for continuous spaces so that it does not require unrealistic assumptions. The key difference between the original and reformulated KL control is that the former measures the control effort by the KL divergence between controlled and uncontrolled transition distributions while the latter replaces the uncontrolled transition by a noise-driven transition. We show that the reformulated KL control admits efficient numerical algorithms like the original one without unreasonable assumptions. Specifically, the associated value function can be computed by using a Monte Carlo method based on its path integral representation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2022.2095827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICE journal of control, measurement, and system integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2022.2095827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Kullback-Leibler (KL)控制为非线性最优控制问题提供了有效的数值方法。KL控制的关键假设是过渡分布的完全可控性。然而,当动态在连续空间中发展时,这个假设经常被违背。因此,将KL控制应用于具有连续空间的问题需要一些近似,这将导致最优性的丧失。为了避免这种近似,在本文中,我们重新表述了连续空间的KL控制问题,使其不需要不切实际的假设。原始和重新表述的KL控制之间的关键区别在于,前者通过受控和非受控过渡分布之间的KL散度来度量控制努力,而后者用噪声驱动的过渡取代非受控过渡。我们表明,重新表述的KL控制允许像原始控制一样有效的数值算法,没有不合理的假设。具体来说,相关的值函数可以通过基于其路径积分表示的蒙特卡罗方法来计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kullback–Leibler control for discrete-time nonlinear systems on continuous spaces
Kullback–Leibler (KL) control enables efficient numerical methods for nonlinear optimal control problems. The crucial assumption of KL control is the full controllability of transition distributions. However, this assumption is often violated when the dynamics evolves in a continuous space. Consequently, applying KL control to problems with continuous spaces requires some approximation, which leads to the loss of the optimality. To avoid such an approximation, in this paper, we reformulate the KL control problem for continuous spaces so that it does not require unrealistic assumptions. The key difference between the original and reformulated KL control is that the former measures the control effort by the KL divergence between controlled and uncontrolled transition distributions while the latter replaces the uncontrolled transition by a noise-driven transition. We show that the reformulated KL control admits efficient numerical algorithms like the original one without unreasonable assumptions. Specifically, the associated value function can be computed by using a Monte Carlo method based on its path integral representation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信