结论

H. Perkins
{"title":"结论","authors":"H. Perkins","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter summarizes the arguments of the entire book and draws together the implications for understanding Ussher and his relationship to early modern theology more broadly. It highlights the difficulties in analyzing Reformed theology after the Restoration, but it demonstrates that prior to the Restoration Ussher was clearly a major figure in the theological development of the Irish and English churches. Ussher’s relationship to puritanism is examined in light of the investigative results detailed throughout the book, and new directions are suggested for future research in Ussher studies and in studies of puritanism and conformity generally.","PeriodicalId":429625,"journal":{"name":"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"H. Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This concluding chapter summarizes the arguments of the entire book and draws together the implications for understanding Ussher and his relationship to early modern theology more broadly. It highlights the difficulties in analyzing Reformed theology after the Restoration, but it demonstrates that prior to the Restoration Ussher was clearly a major figure in the theological development of the Irish and English churches. Ussher’s relationship to puritanism is examined in light of the investigative results detailed throughout the book, and new directions are suggested for future research in Ussher studies and in studies of puritanism and conformity generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works\",\"volume\":\"291 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholicity and the Covenant of Works","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197514184.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这最后一章总结了整本书的论点,并将更广泛地理解厄舍及其与早期现代神学的关系的含义汇集在一起。它强调了分析复辟后改革宗神学的困难,但它表明,在复辟之前,厄舍显然是爱尔兰和英国教会神学发展的主要人物。厄舍与清教主义的关系是根据全书中详细的调查结果进行检查的,并为厄舍研究以及清教主义和从众研究的未来研究提出了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion
This concluding chapter summarizes the arguments of the entire book and draws together the implications for understanding Ussher and his relationship to early modern theology more broadly. It highlights the difficulties in analyzing Reformed theology after the Restoration, but it demonstrates that prior to the Restoration Ussher was clearly a major figure in the theological development of the Irish and English churches. Ussher’s relationship to puritanism is examined in light of the investigative results detailed throughout the book, and new directions are suggested for future research in Ussher studies and in studies of puritanism and conformity generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信