ATM和ServerNet互连的视频传输性能比较

Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems Pub Date : 1997-06-03 DOI:10.1109/MMCS.1997.609781

Ashfaq Hossain, S. Kang, B. Horst

{"title":"ATM和ServerNet互连的视频传输性能比较","authors":"Ashfaq Hossain, S. Kang, B. Horst","doi":"10.1109/MMCS.1997.609781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors discuss the implementation of iPOINT Video Server and Video Client applications along with rate-control feedbacks and network loss handling mechanisms. They report experimental results for ATM and ServerNet, using 60 MHz SparcStation20s (SS20), 30 MHz SparcStation10s (SS10) and 100 MHz Pentium (P5) systems as video servers. The study compares CPU utilization and corresponding video throughput of these platforms, running Solaris 2.5 and WindowsNT 3.51, respectively. They show how these network interfaces affect the behavior of these hosts as video servers and thereby the quality of served video.","PeriodicalId":302885,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of video transport over ATM and ServerNet interconnects\",\"authors\":\"Ashfaq Hossain, S. Kang, B. Horst\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMCS.1997.609781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors discuss the implementation of iPOINT Video Server and Video Client applications along with rate-control feedbacks and network loss handling mechanisms. They report experimental results for ATM and ServerNet, using 60 MHz SparcStation20s (SS20), 30 MHz SparcStation10s (SS10) and 100 MHz Pentium (P5) systems as video servers. The study compares CPU utilization and corresponding video throughput of these platforms, running Solaris 2.5 and WindowsNT 3.51, respectively. They show how these network interfaces affect the behavior of these hosts as video servers and thereby the quality of served video.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMCS.1997.609781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMCS.1997.609781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

作者讨论了iPOINT视频服务器和视频客户端应用程序的实现以及速率控制反馈和网络丢失处理机制。他们报告了ATM和ServerNet的实验结果，使用60 MHz SparcStation20s (SS20)， 30 MHz SparcStation10s (SS10)和100 MHz Pentium (P5)系统作为视频服务器。该研究比较了这些平台的CPU利用率和相应的视频吞吐量，分别运行Solaris 2.5和WindowsNT 3.51。它们显示了这些网络接口如何影响这些主机作为视频服务器的行为，从而影响所服务视频的质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Performance comparison of video transport over ATM and ServerNet interconnects

The authors discuss the implementation of iPOINT Video Server and Video Client applications along with rate-control feedbacks and network loss handling mechanisms. They report experimental results for ATM and ServerNet, using 60 MHz SparcStation20s (SS20), 30 MHz SparcStation10s (SS10) and 100 MHz Pentium (P5) systems as video servers. The study compares CPU utilization and corresponding video throughput of these platforms, running Solaris 2.5 and WindowsNT 3.51, respectively. They show how these network interfaces affect the behavior of these hosts as video servers and thereby the quality of served video.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems

自引率

0.00%

发文量