英国信息系统课程:本科课程调查(研究进行中)

Angelos Stefanidis, G. Fitzgerald
{"title":"英国信息系统课程:本科课程调查(研究进行中)","authors":"Angelos Stefanidis, G. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.11120/ital.2010.09010087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For the most part of the current decade academia and industry have been reporting decreasing numbers of Information Systems (IS) undergraduate students and IS graduate professionals respectively. Among the possible explanations offered, a number of researchers have argued that ageing IS undergraduate curricula are partly to blame for the demise of the discipline. As a first step, the authors of this work have set out to classify existing IS curricula offered by UK universities to enable further research around the areas of curriculum development, skills and pedagogy. The study uses the IS Body of Knowledge (BoK) descriptors which are part of the UK’s Quality Assurance Agency 1 (QAA) Subject Benchmark Statement for Computing (SBSC). The results of the study are supplemented by data about course entry requirements, course naming conventions and course accreditation by the British Computer Society (BCS). It is hoped that IS academics, curriculum developers and IS practitioners will benefit from gaining a better understanding of what IS students are expected to know when they graduate.","PeriodicalId":247470,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Systems Curricula in the UK: A Survey of Undergraduate Courses (research-in-progress)\",\"authors\":\"Angelos Stefanidis, G. Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.11120/ital.2010.09010087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract For the most part of the current decade academia and industry have been reporting decreasing numbers of Information Systems (IS) undergraduate students and IS graduate professionals respectively. Among the possible explanations offered, a number of researchers have argued that ageing IS undergraduate curricula are partly to blame for the demise of the discipline. As a first step, the authors of this work have set out to classify existing IS curricula offered by UK universities to enable further research around the areas of curriculum development, skills and pedagogy. The study uses the IS Body of Knowledge (BoK) descriptors which are part of the UK’s Quality Assurance Agency 1 (QAA) Subject Benchmark Statement for Computing (SBSC). The results of the study are supplemented by data about course entry requirements, course naming conventions and course accreditation by the British Computer Society (BCS). It is hoped that IS academics, curriculum developers and IS practitioners will benefit from gaining a better understanding of what IS students are expected to know when they graduate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2010.09010087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2010.09010087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在过去十年的大部分时间里,学术界和工业界分别报告了信息系统(IS)本科生和IS研究生专业人员数量的减少。在各种可能的解释中,许多研究人员认为,老龄化的信息系统本科课程是该学科消亡的部分原因。作为第一步,这项工作的作者已经着手对英国大学提供的现有信息系统课程进行分类,以便围绕课程开发,技能和教学法领域进行进一步研究。该研究使用IS知识体系(BoK)描述符,该描述符是英国质量保证局(QAA)计算学科基准声明(SBSC)的一部分。研究结果还补充了有关课程入学要求、课程命名惯例和英国计算机协会(BCS)课程认证的数据。希望信息系统学者、课程开发人员和信息系统从业者能够从更好地了解信息系统学生毕业时应该知道的内容中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Systems Curricula in the UK: A Survey of Undergraduate Courses (research-in-progress)
Abstract For the most part of the current decade academia and industry have been reporting decreasing numbers of Information Systems (IS) undergraduate students and IS graduate professionals respectively. Among the possible explanations offered, a number of researchers have argued that ageing IS undergraduate curricula are partly to blame for the demise of the discipline. As a first step, the authors of this work have set out to classify existing IS curricula offered by UK universities to enable further research around the areas of curriculum development, skills and pedagogy. The study uses the IS Body of Knowledge (BoK) descriptors which are part of the UK’s Quality Assurance Agency 1 (QAA) Subject Benchmark Statement for Computing (SBSC). The results of the study are supplemented by data about course entry requirements, course naming conventions and course accreditation by the British Computer Society (BCS). It is hoped that IS academics, curriculum developers and IS practitioners will benefit from gaining a better understanding of what IS students are expected to know when they graduate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信