评估MOOC中的检索实践:视频摘要的写作和阅读如何影响学生的学习

T. Zee, Dan Davis, Nadira Saab, B. Giesbers, Jasper Ginn, F. V. D. Sluis, F. Paas, W. Admiraal
{"title":"评估MOOC中的检索实践:视频摘要的写作和阅读如何影响学生的学习","authors":"T. Zee, Dan Davis, Nadira Saab, B. Giesbers, Jasper Ginn, F. V. D. Sluis, F. Paas, W. Admiraal","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Videos are often the core content in open online education, such as in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Students spend most of their time in a MOOC on watching educational videos. However, merely watching a video is a relatively passive learning activity. To increase the educational benefits of online videos, students could benefit from more actively interacting with the to-be-learned material. In this paper two studies (n = 13k) are presented which examined the educational benefits of two more active learning strategies: 1) Retrieval Practice tasks which asked students to shortly summarize the content of videos, and 2) Given Summary tasks in which the students were asked to read pre-written summaries of videos. Writing, as well as reading summaries of videos were positively related to quiz grades. Both interventions seemed to help students to perform better, but there was no apparent difference between the efficacy of these interventions. These studies show how the quality of online education can be improved by adapting course design to established approaches from the learning sciences.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating retrieval practice in a MOOC: how writing and reading summaries of videos affects student learning\",\"authors\":\"T. Zee, Dan Davis, Nadira Saab, B. Giesbers, Jasper Ginn, F. V. D. Sluis, F. Paas, W. Admiraal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3170358.3170382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Videos are often the core content in open online education, such as in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Students spend most of their time in a MOOC on watching educational videos. However, merely watching a video is a relatively passive learning activity. To increase the educational benefits of online videos, students could benefit from more actively interacting with the to-be-learned material. In this paper two studies (n = 13k) are presented which examined the educational benefits of two more active learning strategies: 1) Retrieval Practice tasks which asked students to shortly summarize the content of videos, and 2) Given Summary tasks in which the students were asked to read pre-written summaries of videos. Writing, as well as reading summaries of videos were positively related to quiz grades. Both interventions seemed to help students to perform better, but there was no apparent difference between the efficacy of these interventions. These studies show how the quality of online education can be improved by adapting course design to established approaches from the learning sciences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

视频通常是在线开放教育的核心内容,例如大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)。学生们在MOOC上的大部分时间都花在观看教育视频上。然而,仅仅看视频是一种相对被动的学习活动。为了增加在线视频的教育效益,学生可以通过更积极地与要学习的材料互动而受益。在本文中,提出了两项研究(n = 13k),研究了两种更积极的学习策略的教育效益:1)检索练习任务,要求学生简要总结视频内容,2)给定摘要任务,要求学生阅读预先写好的视频摘要。写作和阅读视频摘要与测验成绩呈正相关。两种干预措施似乎都能帮助学生表现得更好,但这些干预措施的效果之间没有明显的差异。这些研究表明,通过调整课程设计以适应学习科学的既定方法,可以提高在线教育的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating retrieval practice in a MOOC: how writing and reading summaries of videos affects student learning
Videos are often the core content in open online education, such as in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Students spend most of their time in a MOOC on watching educational videos. However, merely watching a video is a relatively passive learning activity. To increase the educational benefits of online videos, students could benefit from more actively interacting with the to-be-learned material. In this paper two studies (n = 13k) are presented which examined the educational benefits of two more active learning strategies: 1) Retrieval Practice tasks which asked students to shortly summarize the content of videos, and 2) Given Summary tasks in which the students were asked to read pre-written summaries of videos. Writing, as well as reading summaries of videos were positively related to quiz grades. Both interventions seemed to help students to perform better, but there was no apparent difference between the efficacy of these interventions. These studies show how the quality of online education can be improved by adapting course design to established approaches from the learning sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信