自由化电力系统中不同电动汽车充电策略的比较

R. Verzijlbergh, Z. Lukszo, M. Ilić
{"title":"自由化电力系统中不同电动汽车充电策略的比较","authors":"R. Verzijlbergh, Z. Lukszo, M. Ilić","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electric vehicles (EVs) can be an important building block of future power systems due to the flexibility of the charging process. In liberalized power systems, the objectives of using this flexibility vary for different actors in the system. In this paper we formulate the optimization problem of EV charging from the perspective of three different actors: 1) consumers (represented by an aggregator), 2) distribution network operators and 3) wind power producers. The respective objectives of these actors can be summarized as minimizing charge costs, minimizing network losses and maximizing profits on a day-ahead market. The results show that the three different perspectives lead to markedly different EV demand profiles. These differences are partly caused by the fact that, due to its stochastic nature, wind power generation weakens the correlation between electricity prices, network load and imbalance volumes.","PeriodicalId":383754,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing different EV charging strategies in liberalized power systems\",\"authors\":\"R. Verzijlbergh, Z. Lukszo, M. Ilić\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2012.6254807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electric vehicles (EVs) can be an important building block of future power systems due to the flexibility of the charging process. In liberalized power systems, the objectives of using this flexibility vary for different actors in the system. In this paper we formulate the optimization problem of EV charging from the perspective of three different actors: 1) consumers (represented by an aggregator), 2) distribution network operators and 3) wind power producers. The respective objectives of these actors can be summarized as minimizing charge costs, minimizing network losses and maximizing profits on a day-ahead market. The results show that the three different perspectives lead to markedly different EV demand profiles. These differences are partly caused by the fact that, due to its stochastic nature, wind power generation weakens the correlation between electricity prices, network load and imbalance volumes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

由于充电过程的灵活性,电动汽车(ev)可以成为未来电力系统的重要组成部分。在自由化的电力系统中,利用这种灵活性的目标因系统中的不同参与者而异。本文从消费者(以集成商为代表)、配电网运营商和风力发电商三个不同主体的角度出发,提出了电动汽车充电优化问题。这些参与者各自的目标可以概括为最小化收费成本,最小化网络损失和最大化前一天市场上的利润。结果表明,三种不同的视角导致电动汽车需求曲线存在显著差异。造成这些差异的部分原因是风力发电的随机性削弱了电价、电网负荷和不平衡量之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing different EV charging strategies in liberalized power systems
Electric vehicles (EVs) can be an important building block of future power systems due to the flexibility of the charging process. In liberalized power systems, the objectives of using this flexibility vary for different actors in the system. In this paper we formulate the optimization problem of EV charging from the perspective of three different actors: 1) consumers (represented by an aggregator), 2) distribution network operators and 3) wind power producers. The respective objectives of these actors can be summarized as minimizing charge costs, minimizing network losses and maximizing profits on a day-ahead market. The results show that the three different perspectives lead to markedly different EV demand profiles. These differences are partly caused by the fact that, due to its stochastic nature, wind power generation weakens the correlation between electricity prices, network load and imbalance volumes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信