面向系统的系统协同技术债务管理

J. Schütz, J. Gómez
{"title":"面向系统的系统协同技术债务管理","authors":"J. Schütz, J. Gómez","doi":"10.1145/3387906.3388620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systems Engineering is a matter of the perspective and scope where several principles of the systems thinking approach coincide. Following the fundamental system principle of holism and interaction theory, in order to understand the whole the system should be considered as a whole. Due to the phenomena of emergence, not all properties of a system can be determined or explained by its components alone. The conceptual model of Technical Debt already recognize the context sensitivity of Technical Debt as an essential factor and identifies phenomena that fall outside the core definition of Technical Debt as a major part of future research.This short paper shows why managing the parts does not equal managing the whole by introducing Technical Debt as an emergent characteristic and why the traditional Technical Debt-Management methods can only be partially applied to Systems of Systems.","PeriodicalId":345508,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Collaborative Technical Debt Management in Systems of Systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Schütz, J. Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387906.3388620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systems Engineering is a matter of the perspective and scope where several principles of the systems thinking approach coincide. Following the fundamental system principle of holism and interaction theory, in order to understand the whole the system should be considered as a whole. Due to the phenomena of emergence, not all properties of a system can be determined or explained by its components alone. The conceptual model of Technical Debt already recognize the context sensitivity of Technical Debt as an essential factor and identifies phenomena that fall outside the core definition of Technical Debt as a major part of future research.This short paper shows why managing the parts does not equal managing the whole by introducing Technical Debt as an emergent characteristic and why the traditional Technical Debt-Management methods can only be partially applied to Systems of Systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387906.3388620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387906.3388620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

系统工程是一个观点和范围的问题,其中系统思维方法的几个原则是一致的。遵循整体论和相互作用理论的基本系统原理,要理解整体,就必须把系统看作一个整体。由于出现的现象,并不是一个系统的所有属性都可以由其组成部分单独确定或解释。技术债务的概念模型已经认识到技术债务的上下文敏感性是一个基本因素,并确定了技术债务核心定义之外的现象,作为未来研究的主要部分。本文通过介绍技术债务作为一种新兴特征来说明为什么管理部分不等于管理整体,以及为什么传统的技术债务管理方法只能部分地应用于系统的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Collaborative Technical Debt Management in Systems of Systems
Systems Engineering is a matter of the perspective and scope where several principles of the systems thinking approach coincide. Following the fundamental system principle of holism and interaction theory, in order to understand the whole the system should be considered as a whole. Due to the phenomena of emergence, not all properties of a system can be determined or explained by its components alone. The conceptual model of Technical Debt already recognize the context sensitivity of Technical Debt as an essential factor and identifies phenomena that fall outside the core definition of Technical Debt as a major part of future research.This short paper shows why managing the parts does not equal managing the whole by introducing Technical Debt as an emergent characteristic and why the traditional Technical Debt-Management methods can only be partially applied to Systems of Systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信