重新设计悬臂定子的4级低速压缩机效率变化研究

Ju Zhenzhou, Jinfang Teng, Lin Fan, Yongjian Zhong, X. Qiang
{"title":"重新设计悬臂定子的4级低速压缩机效率变化研究","authors":"Ju Zhenzhou, Jinfang Teng, Lin Fan, Yongjian Zhong, X. Qiang","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-87166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerical simulations with the steady 3D RANS were performed on a 4-stage low speed research compressor (LSRC) with two typical configurations (a shrouded and a redesigned cantilevered stator of the third stator). The shrouded stator (SS) with 0.67% labyrinth seal clearance of the blade height is the prototype, and the cantilevered stator (CS) with 1.2% hub clearance of the blade height is the redesigned cantilevered stator. The fourth rotor that follows after the cantilevered stator was redesigned (RE) according to blade load and inlet flow angle changed based on the redesigned cantilevered stator. The overall performance of the 4-stage LSRC and the distribution of aerodynamic parameters along the blade height were compared between the prototype and the redesigned third stator. Flow characteristics of the third stator and fourth rotor were analyzed in detail. The results indicate that the flow characteristics below the 35% blade height are very different between the prototype and the redesigned due to the effect of leakage flow from seal cavity and hub gap, respectively. The stall margin of CS is 57% higher than SS. The efficiency of CS at the design point is 0.82% higher than SS. Through the redesigned process of R4, the stall margin of RE is 45% higher than CS and the efficiency of R4 is 0.6% higher on average over the entire operating range.","PeriodicalId":229616,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency Variation on a 4-Stage Low Speed Research Compressor With a Redesigned Cantilevered Stator\",\"authors\":\"Ju Zhenzhou, Jinfang Teng, Lin Fan, Yongjian Zhong, X. Qiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/IMECE2018-87166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerical simulations with the steady 3D RANS were performed on a 4-stage low speed research compressor (LSRC) with two typical configurations (a shrouded and a redesigned cantilevered stator of the third stator). The shrouded stator (SS) with 0.67% labyrinth seal clearance of the blade height is the prototype, and the cantilevered stator (CS) with 1.2% hub clearance of the blade height is the redesigned cantilevered stator. The fourth rotor that follows after the cantilevered stator was redesigned (RE) according to blade load and inlet flow angle changed based on the redesigned cantilevered stator. The overall performance of the 4-stage LSRC and the distribution of aerodynamic parameters along the blade height were compared between the prototype and the redesigned third stator. Flow characteristics of the third stator and fourth rotor were analyzed in detail. The results indicate that the flow characteristics below the 35% blade height are very different between the prototype and the redesigned due to the effect of leakage flow from seal cavity and hub gap, respectively. The stall margin of CS is 57% higher than SS. The efficiency of CS at the design point is 0.82% higher than SS. Through the redesigned process of R4, the stall margin of RE is 45% higher than CS and the efficiency of R4 is 0.6% higher on average over the entire operating range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-87166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在4级低速研究压气机(LSRC)上进行了稳态三维RANS的数值模拟,该压气机具有两种典型配置(第3级定子为带冠定子和重新设计的悬臂定子)。叶片高度迷宫密封间隙为0.67%的冠状定子(SS)为原型,叶片高度轮毂间隙为1.2%的悬臂定子(CS)为重新设计的悬臂定子。根据叶片负载和在重新设计的悬臂定子基础上改变的进口气流角,对悬臂定子后的第四个转子进行重新设计(RE)。对比了原型机和重新设计的第三定子的整体性能和气动参数沿叶片高度的分布。详细分析了第三定子和第四转子的流动特性。结果表明:在35%叶高以下,由于密封腔泄漏流和轮毂间隙泄漏流的影响,原型机与重新设计的叶片流动特性存在较大差异;CS的失速余量比SS高57%,CS在设计点的效率比SS高0.82%,通过R4的重新设计流程,RE的失速余量比CS高45%,R4在整个运行范围内的效率平均高出0.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency Variation on a 4-Stage Low Speed Research Compressor With a Redesigned Cantilevered Stator
Numerical simulations with the steady 3D RANS were performed on a 4-stage low speed research compressor (LSRC) with two typical configurations (a shrouded and a redesigned cantilevered stator of the third stator). The shrouded stator (SS) with 0.67% labyrinth seal clearance of the blade height is the prototype, and the cantilevered stator (CS) with 1.2% hub clearance of the blade height is the redesigned cantilevered stator. The fourth rotor that follows after the cantilevered stator was redesigned (RE) according to blade load and inlet flow angle changed based on the redesigned cantilevered stator. The overall performance of the 4-stage LSRC and the distribution of aerodynamic parameters along the blade height were compared between the prototype and the redesigned third stator. Flow characteristics of the third stator and fourth rotor were analyzed in detail. The results indicate that the flow characteristics below the 35% blade height are very different between the prototype and the redesigned due to the effect of leakage flow from seal cavity and hub gap, respectively. The stall margin of CS is 57% higher than SS. The efficiency of CS at the design point is 0.82% higher than SS. Through the redesigned process of R4, the stall margin of RE is 45% higher than CS and the efficiency of R4 is 0.6% higher on average over the entire operating range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信