解开多领域协作的分散授权

Hannah K. Lee
{"title":"解开多领域协作的分散授权","authors":"Hannah K. Lee","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current authorization solutions take highly case-by-case approaches. First of all, the solutions address particular types of multi-domain collaborations such as virtual organization or resource-sharing collaborations. Secondly, they tend to be based on specific technology their subject interactions adopt. We consider this phenomena of having a number of different authorization solutions as a result of taking a mainly bottom-up approach to cater the authorization need of diverse types of mult-domain collaborations currently existing. In this paper, we present an extended analysis of different types of multi-domain collaborations based on various e-Government case studies as well as that of existing authorization solutions. With the converged requirements resulting from those analyses, we take a top-down approach of explicitly highlighting generic and interoperable components for a decentralized authorization scheme. This approach appears to be more suitable to produce a more efficient and elegant authorization solution for the majority of multi-domain collaborations.","PeriodicalId":340691,"journal":{"name":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling decentralized authorization for multi-domain collaborations\",\"authors\":\"Hannah K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current authorization solutions take highly case-by-case approaches. First of all, the solutions address particular types of multi-domain collaborations such as virtual organization or resource-sharing collaborations. Secondly, they tend to be based on specific technology their subject interactions adopt. We consider this phenomena of having a number of different authorization solutions as a result of taking a mainly bottom-up approach to cater the authorization need of diverse types of mult-domain collaborations currently existing. In this paper, we present an extended analysis of different types of multi-domain collaborations based on various e-Government case studies as well as that of existing authorization solutions. With the converged requirements resulting from those analyses, we take a top-down approach of explicitly highlighting generic and interoperable components for a decentralized authorization scheme. This approach appears to be more suitable to produce a more efficient and elegant authorization solution for the majority of multi-domain collaborations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当前的授权解决方案采用高度具体情况具体分析的方法。首先,解决方案处理特定类型的多领域协作,例如虚拟组织或资源共享协作。其次,它们往往基于其主体交互所采用的特定技术。我们认为,由于采用了一种主要的自底向上的方法来满足当前存在的不同类型的多域协作的授权需求,因此出现了许多不同的授权解决方案。在本文中,我们基于各种电子政务案例研究以及现有授权解决方案,对不同类型的多领域协作进行了扩展分析。有了这些分析产生的聚合需求,我们采用了一种自顶向下的方法,为分散的授权方案显式突出显示通用和可互操作的组件。这种方法似乎更适合为大多数多域协作生成更高效、更优雅的授权解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unraveling decentralized authorization for multi-domain collaborations
Current authorization solutions take highly case-by-case approaches. First of all, the solutions address particular types of multi-domain collaborations such as virtual organization or resource-sharing collaborations. Secondly, they tend to be based on specific technology their subject interactions adopt. We consider this phenomena of having a number of different authorization solutions as a result of taking a mainly bottom-up approach to cater the authorization need of diverse types of mult-domain collaborations currently existing. In this paper, we present an extended analysis of different types of multi-domain collaborations based on various e-Government case studies as well as that of existing authorization solutions. With the converged requirements resulting from those analyses, we take a top-down approach of explicitly highlighting generic and interoperable components for a decentralized authorization scheme. This approach appears to be more suitable to produce a more efficient and elegant authorization solution for the majority of multi-domain collaborations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信