{"title":"空想家、表意符号和“最优秀的人”:从卡特到里根","authors":"Martha Anna Martin","doi":"10.1080/10417948309372585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that Republican malfeasance during the Watergate episodes provided Jimmy Carter with an excellent opportunity to structure for himself a presidential image of “good moral character,” “intelligence” and “competency\"—an ideographic cluster mirroring the nineteenth century's definition of “best men.” However, it is further argued that Carter's handling of this opportunity resulted in these ideographs being used against him during the 1980 Reagan‐Carter campaign.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"163 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideologues, ideographs, and “the best men”: From carter to Reagan\",\"authors\":\"Martha Anna Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948309372585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay argues that Republican malfeasance during the Watergate episodes provided Jimmy Carter with an excellent opportunity to structure for himself a presidential image of “good moral character,” “intelligence” and “competency\\\"—an ideographic cluster mirroring the nineteenth century's definition of “best men.” However, it is further argued that Carter's handling of this opportunity resulted in these ideographs being used against him during the 1980 Reagan‐Carter campaign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"163 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948309372585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948309372585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ideologues, ideographs, and “the best men”: From carter to Reagan
This essay argues that Republican malfeasance during the Watergate episodes provided Jimmy Carter with an excellent opportunity to structure for himself a presidential image of “good moral character,” “intelligence” and “competency"—an ideographic cluster mirroring the nineteenth century's definition of “best men.” However, it is further argued that Carter's handling of this opportunity resulted in these ideographs being used against him during the 1980 Reagan‐Carter campaign.