评估风险管理体系可信度的问题

V. Selifanov, Veronika V. Anikeeva, Igor A. Ognev
{"title":"评估风险管理体系可信度的问题","authors":"V. Selifanov, Veronika V. Anikeeva, Igor A. Ognev","doi":"10.17212/2782-2230-2023-1-69-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the assessment of confidence in the risk management system. The term trust in relation to information systems is practically not used nowadays. The author proposes a procedure for assessing confidence in the risk management system, which consists of four stages: compliance with the requirements of Russian legislation and national standards, assessing the optimality of the existing risk management system and reassessing risks. A description of existing methods for assessing confidence in risk management systems has been given. It is concluded that at present there are no existing requirements to the system of risk assessment even in some segments. The paper proposes to use a pre-agreed by stakeholders’ selection of criteria for assessing risks from a system of standards that describe the process of risk assessment in terms of systems engineering. The criteria and indicators used in the standards that define systems analysis are considered. Probabilistic assessment of a few indicators is taken as the basis of risk assessment: risk of violation of reliability of process implementation without regard to information protection requirements; risk of violation of information protection requirements in the process; integral risk of violation of process implementation with regard to information protection requirements. To calculate these risk indicators the investigated entities are examined in the form of a modeled system of a complex structure. A mathematical model for assessing risks in accordance with the provisions of systems engineering standards is presented.","PeriodicalId":207311,"journal":{"name":"Digital Technology Security","volume":"367 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues of assessing the credibility of the risk management system\",\"authors\":\"V. Selifanov, Veronika V. Anikeeva, Igor A. Ognev\",\"doi\":\"10.17212/2782-2230-2023-1-69-82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to the assessment of confidence in the risk management system. The term trust in relation to information systems is practically not used nowadays. The author proposes a procedure for assessing confidence in the risk management system, which consists of four stages: compliance with the requirements of Russian legislation and national standards, assessing the optimality of the existing risk management system and reassessing risks. A description of existing methods for assessing confidence in risk management systems has been given. It is concluded that at present there are no existing requirements to the system of risk assessment even in some segments. The paper proposes to use a pre-agreed by stakeholders’ selection of criteria for assessing risks from a system of standards that describe the process of risk assessment in terms of systems engineering. The criteria and indicators used in the standards that define systems analysis are considered. Probabilistic assessment of a few indicators is taken as the basis of risk assessment: risk of violation of reliability of process implementation without regard to information protection requirements; risk of violation of information protection requirements in the process; integral risk of violation of process implementation with regard to information protection requirements. To calculate these risk indicators the investigated entities are examined in the form of a modeled system of a complex structure. A mathematical model for assessing risks in accordance with the provisions of systems engineering standards is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Technology Security\",\"volume\":\"367 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Technology Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17212/2782-2230-2023-1-69-82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Technology Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17212/2782-2230-2023-1-69-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于对风险管理体系的信心进行评估。“信任”一词与信息系统的关系现在已经很少使用了。作者提出了一种评估风险管理体系信心的程序,该程序包括四个阶段:符合俄罗斯立法和国家标准的要求,评估现有风险管理体系的最优性和重新评估风险。介绍了评估风险管理系统信心的现有方法。结论是,即使在某些环节,目前也没有对风险评估制度的现有要求。本文建议使用利益相关者预先商定的标准选择,从系统工程方面描述风险评估过程的标准系统中评估风险。考虑定义系统分析的标准中使用的标准和指标。以几个指标的概率性评估作为风险评估的依据:不考虑信息保护要求的流程实施可靠性违规风险;过程中存在违反信息保护要求的风险;与信息保护要求相关的违反流程实施的整体风险。为了计算这些风险指标,被调查的实体以复杂结构的建模系统的形式进行检查。根据系统工程标准的规定,提出了风险评估的数学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Issues of assessing the credibility of the risk management system
This article is devoted to the assessment of confidence in the risk management system. The term trust in relation to information systems is practically not used nowadays. The author proposes a procedure for assessing confidence in the risk management system, which consists of four stages: compliance with the requirements of Russian legislation and national standards, assessing the optimality of the existing risk management system and reassessing risks. A description of existing methods for assessing confidence in risk management systems has been given. It is concluded that at present there are no existing requirements to the system of risk assessment even in some segments. The paper proposes to use a pre-agreed by stakeholders’ selection of criteria for assessing risks from a system of standards that describe the process of risk assessment in terms of systems engineering. The criteria and indicators used in the standards that define systems analysis are considered. Probabilistic assessment of a few indicators is taken as the basis of risk assessment: risk of violation of reliability of process implementation without regard to information protection requirements; risk of violation of information protection requirements in the process; integral risk of violation of process implementation with regard to information protection requirements. To calculate these risk indicators the investigated entities are examined in the form of a modeled system of a complex structure. A mathematical model for assessing risks in accordance with the provisions of systems engineering standards is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信