联锁什么时候起作用?制度逻辑与多重公司治理实践的扩散

A. Shipilov, H. Greve, Tim J. Rowley
{"title":"联锁什么时候起作用?制度逻辑与多重公司治理实践的扩散","authors":"A. Shipilov, H. Greve, Tim J. Rowley","doi":"10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the wealth of research on the origins of institutions, little is known about how institutions and their underlying logics are extended following initial diffusion stage. We argue that institutional extension happens through multi-wave diffusion of related practices such that an organization’s adoption of practices from an institutional logic implies its acceptance of the logic. This makes organizational adoption of subsequent practices sharing the same logic more likely, irrespective of these practices’ adoptions by the organization’s network contacts. We show evidence of such effects though analyzing the diffusion of governance practices related to the logic of board reform in Canada.","PeriodicalId":168140,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"198","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Do Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices\",\"authors\":\"A. Shipilov, H. Greve, Tim J. Rowley\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the wealth of research on the origins of institutions, little is known about how institutions and their underlying logics are extended following initial diffusion stage. We argue that institutional extension happens through multi-wave diffusion of related practices such that an organization’s adoption of practices from an institutional logic implies its acceptance of the logic. This makes organizational adoption of subsequent practices sharing the same logic more likely, irrespective of these practices’ adoptions by the organization’s network contacts. We show evidence of such effects though analyzing the diffusion of governance practices related to the logic of board reform in Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"198\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 198

摘要

尽管对制度起源的研究非常丰富,但对于制度及其基本逻辑在初始扩散阶段之后是如何扩展的却知之甚少。我们认为制度延伸是通过相关实践的多波扩散发生的,这样一个组织从制度逻辑中采用实践意味着它接受了该逻辑。这使得组织更有可能采用共享相同逻辑的后续实践,而不考虑组织的网络联系人是否采用了这些实践。我们通过分析与加拿大董事会改革逻辑相关的治理实践的扩散,展示了这种影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Do Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices
Despite the wealth of research on the origins of institutions, little is known about how institutions and their underlying logics are extended following initial diffusion stage. We argue that institutional extension happens through multi-wave diffusion of related practices such that an organization’s adoption of practices from an institutional logic implies its acceptance of the logic. This makes organizational adoption of subsequent practices sharing the same logic more likely, irrespective of these practices’ adoptions by the organization’s network contacts. We show evidence of such effects though analyzing the diffusion of governance practices related to the logic of board reform in Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信