量子系统中二元假设检验的工作特性

Catherine Medlock, A. Oppenheim, I. Chuang, Qi Ding
{"title":"量子系统中二元假设检验的工作特性","authors":"Catherine Medlock, A. Oppenheim, I. Chuang, Qi Ding","doi":"10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) are a well-established representation of the tradeoff between detection and false alarm probabilities in classical binary hypothesis testing. We use classical ROCs as motivation for two types of operating characteristics for binary hypothesis testing in quantum systems – decision operating characteristics (QDOCs) and measurement operating characteristics (QMOCs). Both are described in the context of a framework we propose that encompasses the typical formulations of binary hypothesis testing in both the classical and quantum scenarios. We interpret Helstrom’s well-known result [1] regarding discrimination between two quantum density operators with minimum probability of error in this framework. We also present a generalization of previous results [2], [3] regarding the correspondence between classical Parseval frames and quantum measurements. The derivation naturally leads to a constructive procedure for generating many different measurements besides Helstrom’s optimal measurement, some standard and others non-standard, that achieve minimum probability of error.","PeriodicalId":120479,"journal":{"name":"2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating Characteristics for Binary Hypothesis Testing in Quantum Systems\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Medlock, A. Oppenheim, I. Chuang, Qi Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) are a well-established representation of the tradeoff between detection and false alarm probabilities in classical binary hypothesis testing. We use classical ROCs as motivation for two types of operating characteristics for binary hypothesis testing in quantum systems – decision operating characteristics (QDOCs) and measurement operating characteristics (QMOCs). Both are described in the context of a framework we propose that encompasses the typical formulations of binary hypothesis testing in both the classical and quantum scenarios. We interpret Helstrom’s well-known result [1] regarding discrimination between two quantum density operators with minimum probability of error in this framework. We also present a generalization of previous results [2], [3] regarding the correspondence between classical Parseval frames and quantum measurements. The derivation naturally leads to a constructive procedure for generating many different measurements besides Helstrom’s optimal measurement, some standard and others non-standard, that achieve minimum probability of error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2019.8919700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在经典的二值假设检验中,接收机工作特性(roc)是检测概率和虚警概率之间权衡的一个公认的表示。我们使用经典roc作为量子系统中二元假设检验的两种类型的操作特征的动机-决策操作特征(QDOCs)和测量操作特征(qmoc)。两者都是在我们提出的框架的背景下描述的,该框架包含了经典和量子场景中二元假设检验的典型公式。我们在这个框架中以最小的误差概率解释Helstrom关于两个量子密度算子之间的区别的著名结果[1]。我们还提出了先前关于经典Parseval帧与量子测量之间对应关系的结果[2],[3]的推广。这种推导自然导致了一个建设性的过程,除了Helstrom的最优测量之外,还产生了许多不同的测量,有些是标准的,有些是非标准的,这些测量都达到了最小的误差概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operating Characteristics for Binary Hypothesis Testing in Quantum Systems
Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) are a well-established representation of the tradeoff between detection and false alarm probabilities in classical binary hypothesis testing. We use classical ROCs as motivation for two types of operating characteristics for binary hypothesis testing in quantum systems – decision operating characteristics (QDOCs) and measurement operating characteristics (QMOCs). Both are described in the context of a framework we propose that encompasses the typical formulations of binary hypothesis testing in both the classical and quantum scenarios. We interpret Helstrom’s well-known result [1] regarding discrimination between two quantum density operators with minimum probability of error in this framework. We also present a generalization of previous results [2], [3] regarding the correspondence between classical Parseval frames and quantum measurements. The derivation naturally leads to a constructive procedure for generating many different measurements besides Helstrom’s optimal measurement, some standard and others non-standard, that achieve minimum probability of error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信