结论

M. Levering
{"title":"结论","authors":"M. Levering","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198838968.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In dialogue with Brian Robinette and Jürgen Moltmann, the chapter asks what kind of apologetics is appropriate to the subject matter of Jesus’ Resurrection. It argues that Jesus’ Resurrection does have “external grounds” for its truth. It can be considered credible even without supernatural faith. Yet, even if non-believers can reasonably affirm that Jesus’ Resurrection happened, such knowledge becomes truly living and powerful within the whole worldview of faith, what Lonergan calls the “horizon of love.” Behind this approach to theological apologetics stands the masterwork of John Henry Newman. In his Grammar of Assent, Newman remarks that certitude in historical matters comes from “the cumulation of probabilities, independent of each other, arising out of the nature and circumstances of the particular case which is under review.” This book provides such an accumulation of probabilities, which Newman deems to be sufficient (through what he calls the “illative sense”) for certitude.","PeriodicalId":328876,"journal":{"name":"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"M. Levering\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198838968.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In dialogue with Brian Robinette and Jürgen Moltmann, the chapter asks what kind of apologetics is appropriate to the subject matter of Jesus’ Resurrection. It argues that Jesus’ Resurrection does have “external grounds” for its truth. It can be considered credible even without supernatural faith. Yet, even if non-believers can reasonably affirm that Jesus’ Resurrection happened, such knowledge becomes truly living and powerful within the whole worldview of faith, what Lonergan calls the “horizon of love.” Behind this approach to theological apologetics stands the masterwork of John Henry Newman. In his Grammar of Assent, Newman remarks that certitude in historical matters comes from “the cumulation of probabilities, independent of each other, arising out of the nature and circumstances of the particular case which is under review.” This book provides such an accumulation of probabilities, which Newman deems to be sufficient (through what he calls the “illative sense”) for certitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838968.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838968.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在与Brian Robinette和j rgen Moltmann的对话中,这一章询问了什么样的护教学适合于耶稣复活的主题。它认为耶稣的复活确实有其真实性的“外部依据”。即使没有超自然信仰,它也可以被认为是可信的。然而,即使非信徒可以合理地肯定耶稣的复活发生了,这样的知识在整个信仰的世界观中变得真实而有力,Lonergan称之为“爱的视野”。在这种神学护教学方法的背后,是约翰·亨利·纽曼的杰作。纽曼在他的《赞同语法》(Grammar of consent)一书中指出,历史事件的确定性来自“相互独立的概率的累积,这些概率源于正在审查的特定情况的性质和情况”。这本书提供了这样一个概率的积累,纽曼认为这是足够的(通过他所谓的“推理感”)的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion
In dialogue with Brian Robinette and Jürgen Moltmann, the chapter asks what kind of apologetics is appropriate to the subject matter of Jesus’ Resurrection. It argues that Jesus’ Resurrection does have “external grounds” for its truth. It can be considered credible even without supernatural faith. Yet, even if non-believers can reasonably affirm that Jesus’ Resurrection happened, such knowledge becomes truly living and powerful within the whole worldview of faith, what Lonergan calls the “horizon of love.” Behind this approach to theological apologetics stands the masterwork of John Henry Newman. In his Grammar of Assent, Newman remarks that certitude in historical matters comes from “the cumulation of probabilities, independent of each other, arising out of the nature and circumstances of the particular case which is under review.” This book provides such an accumulation of probabilities, which Newman deems to be sufficient (through what he calls the “illative sense”) for certitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信