中国刑事不公正的补救措施

Jiang Na, Wang Yue
{"title":"中国刑事不公正的补救措施","authors":"Jiang Na, Wang Yue","doi":"10.15406/FRCIJ.2018.06.00230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The revisions of Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC (2012 CPL) are designed to advocate ‘respecting and protecting human rights’ as a legal principle of criminal procedures in China’s practice. In promoting the new revisions, Case SHE Xianglin and Case ZHAO Zuohai have been milestones of Chinese reforms on its criminal justice.1 Ironically, external bodies issued China’s human rights reports,2 including its extensive use of extralegal detention, widespread practice of torture and other flawed justice in practice. The actual implementation of new reforms has been watched by various human rights groups3 in order to fill in the gap between legal requirements and poor implementation. It is necessary for China to learn lessons from the past experience and explore whether it is possible or not to establish a new mechanism for adequate remedies of repeated criminal injustices and if so, how to make it on the ground.","PeriodicalId":284029,"journal":{"name":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remedies for criminal injustice in China\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Na, Wang Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/FRCIJ.2018.06.00230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The revisions of Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC (2012 CPL) are designed to advocate ‘respecting and protecting human rights’ as a legal principle of criminal procedures in China’s practice. In promoting the new revisions, Case SHE Xianglin and Case ZHAO Zuohai have been milestones of Chinese reforms on its criminal justice.1 Ironically, external bodies issued China’s human rights reports,2 including its extensive use of extralegal detention, widespread practice of torture and other flawed justice in practice. The actual implementation of new reforms has been watched by various human rights groups3 in order to fill in the gap between legal requirements and poor implementation. It is necessary for China to learn lessons from the past experience and explore whether it is possible or not to establish a new mechanism for adequate remedies of repeated criminal injustices and if so, how to make it on the ground.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/FRCIJ.2018.06.00230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/FRCIJ.2018.06.00230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(2012年)的修订旨在倡导“尊重和保障人权”作为中国刑事诉讼的法律原则。在推动新修订的过程中,佘祥林案和赵作海案成为中国刑事司法改革的里程碑具有讽刺意味的是,外部机构发布了中国的人权报告,包括其广泛使用法外拘留,广泛使用酷刑和其他司法实践中的缺陷。各种人权组织一直在关注新改革的实际执行情况,以填补法律要求和执行不力之间的差距。中国有必要从过去的经验中吸取教训,探讨是否有可能建立一种新的机制,对反复发生的刑事不公正进行充分的补救,如果有可能,如何在实地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remedies for criminal injustice in China
The revisions of Criminal Procedure Law of the PRC (2012 CPL) are designed to advocate ‘respecting and protecting human rights’ as a legal principle of criminal procedures in China’s practice. In promoting the new revisions, Case SHE Xianglin and Case ZHAO Zuohai have been milestones of Chinese reforms on its criminal justice.1 Ironically, external bodies issued China’s human rights reports,2 including its extensive use of extralegal detention, widespread practice of torture and other flawed justice in practice. The actual implementation of new reforms has been watched by various human rights groups3 in order to fill in the gap between legal requirements and poor implementation. It is necessary for China to learn lessons from the past experience and explore whether it is possible or not to establish a new mechanism for adequate remedies of repeated criminal injustices and if so, how to make it on the ground.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信