{"title":"产品族可变性的正式描述","authors":"P. Asirelli, M. T. Beek, S. Gnesi, A. Fantechi","doi":"10.1109/SPLC.2011.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We illustrate how to manage variability in a single logical framework consisting of a Modal Transition System (MTS) and an associated set of formulae expressed in the branching-time temporal logic MHML interpreted in a deontic way over such MTSs. We discuss the commonalities and differences with the framework of Classen et al. based on Featured Transition Systems and Linear-time Temporal Logic.","PeriodicalId":278787,"journal":{"name":"2011 15th International Software Product Line Conference","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"101","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Description of Variability in Product Families\",\"authors\":\"P. Asirelli, M. T. Beek, S. Gnesi, A. Fantechi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPLC.2011.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We illustrate how to manage variability in a single logical framework consisting of a Modal Transition System (MTS) and an associated set of formulae expressed in the branching-time temporal logic MHML interpreted in a deontic way over such MTSs. We discuss the commonalities and differences with the framework of Classen et al. based on Featured Transition Systems and Linear-time Temporal Logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 15th International Software Product Line Conference\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"101\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 15th International Software Product Line Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPLC.2011.34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 15th International Software Product Line Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPLC.2011.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Formal Description of Variability in Product Families
We illustrate how to manage variability in a single logical framework consisting of a Modal Transition System (MTS) and an associated set of formulae expressed in the branching-time temporal logic MHML interpreted in a deontic way over such MTSs. We discuss the commonalities and differences with the framework of Classen et al. based on Featured Transition Systems and Linear-time Temporal Logic.