{"title":"UML活动图的自动评估","authors":"Michael Striewe, M. Goedicke","doi":"10.1145/2591708.2602657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current approaches to automated assessment of UML diagram mainly focus on static analysis. As this may be insufficient for behavioural diagrams, this contribution presents an approach to dynamic checks of UML Activity Diagrams. The approach makes use of trace generation and sequence alignment and shows fair results in preliminary experiments.","PeriodicalId":334476,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated assessment of UML activity diagrams\",\"authors\":\"Michael Striewe, M. Goedicke\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2591708.2602657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current approaches to automated assessment of UML diagram mainly focus on static analysis. As this may be insufficient for behavioural diagrams, this contribution presents an approach to dynamic checks of UML Activity Diagrams. The approach makes use of trace generation and sequence alignment and shows fair results in preliminary experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current approaches to automated assessment of UML diagram mainly focus on static analysis. As this may be insufficient for behavioural diagrams, this contribution presents an approach to dynamic checks of UML Activity Diagrams. The approach makes use of trace generation and sequence alignment and shows fair results in preliminary experiments.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
