线平均池化:处理CNN上用于皮肤癌分类的特征图的更好方法

Zipei Chen, Yifei Du, Teoh Teik Toe
{"title":"线平均池化:处理CNN上用于皮肤癌分类的特征图的更好方法","authors":"Zipei Chen, Yifei Du, Teoh Teik Toe","doi":"10.1109/CACML55074.2022.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a new pooling method called line average pooling (LAP), which operates between the convolution layer and the final output layer, replacing the traditional mapping method, such as Flatten and global average pooling (GAP). LAP effectively reduces the total number of parameters of the model, thereby preventing overfitting effectively while retaining more features from high-level feature maps. Additionally, it increases the fitting speed of the model. We selected the ISIC skin cancer dataset, then examined the performances of three pooling methods: LAP, GAP and Flatten, on a customized CNN model. In addition, we analyzed the fitting degree when the epoch was 100. The experimental results show that, the degree of overfitting using LAP is greatly reduced when compared with Flatten. Compared with GAP, LAP is better and faster in extracting features and fitting the training data. Both GAP and LAP demonstrate good generalization abilities, reaching 87.56% and 88.11% respectively. With proper means of additional regularization, LAP can even perform better than GAP.","PeriodicalId":137505,"journal":{"name":"2022 Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML)","volume":"28 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Line Average Pooling: A Better Way to Handle Feature Maps on CNN for Skin Cancer Classification\",\"authors\":\"Zipei Chen, Yifei Du, Teoh Teik Toe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CACML55074.2022.00094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a new pooling method called line average pooling (LAP), which operates between the convolution layer and the final output layer, replacing the traditional mapping method, such as Flatten and global average pooling (GAP). LAP effectively reduces the total number of parameters of the model, thereby preventing overfitting effectively while retaining more features from high-level feature maps. Additionally, it increases the fitting speed of the model. We selected the ISIC skin cancer dataset, then examined the performances of three pooling methods: LAP, GAP and Flatten, on a customized CNN model. In addition, we analyzed the fitting degree when the epoch was 100. The experimental results show that, the degree of overfitting using LAP is greatly reduced when compared with Flatten. Compared with GAP, LAP is better and faster in extracting features and fitting the training data. Both GAP and LAP demonstrate good generalization abilities, reaching 87.56% and 88.11% respectively. With proper means of additional regularization, LAP can even perform better than GAP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML)\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CACML55074.2022.00094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CACML55074.2022.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的池化方法,称为线平均池化(LAP),它在卷积层和最终输出层之间运行,取代了传统的映射方法,如Flatten和global average pooling (GAP)。LAP有效地减少了模型的参数总数,从而有效地防止了过拟合,同时保留了更多高级特征图中的特征。同时提高了模型的拟合速度。我们选择了ISIC皮肤癌数据集,然后在定制的CNN模型上测试了三种池化方法:LAP, GAP和Flatten的性能。此外,我们还分析了历元为100时的拟合程度。实验结果表明,与Flatten相比,LAP的过拟合程度大大降低。与GAP相比,LAP在提取特征和拟合训练数据方面更好更快。GAP和LAP的泛化能力均较好,分别达到87.56%和88.11%。通过适当的额外正则化手段,LAP甚至可以比GAP表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Line Average Pooling: A Better Way to Handle Feature Maps on CNN for Skin Cancer Classification
This paper proposes a new pooling method called line average pooling (LAP), which operates between the convolution layer and the final output layer, replacing the traditional mapping method, such as Flatten and global average pooling (GAP). LAP effectively reduces the total number of parameters of the model, thereby preventing overfitting effectively while retaining more features from high-level feature maps. Additionally, it increases the fitting speed of the model. We selected the ISIC skin cancer dataset, then examined the performances of three pooling methods: LAP, GAP and Flatten, on a customized CNN model. In addition, we analyzed the fitting degree when the epoch was 100. The experimental results show that, the degree of overfitting using LAP is greatly reduced when compared with Flatten. Compared with GAP, LAP is better and faster in extracting features and fitting the training data. Both GAP and LAP demonstrate good generalization abilities, reaching 87.56% and 88.11% respectively. With proper means of additional regularization, LAP can even perform better than GAP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信