论Epagôgê的性质

Epoch Pub Date : 2006-04-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE200611122
Russell Winslow
{"title":"论Epagôgê的性质","authors":"Russell Winslow","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE200611122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay pursues an interpretation of epagoge in Aristotle in order to challenge the current claims in the scholarship that Aristotle's method of discovery is, on the one hand, empirical or, on the other hand, a priori. In contrast to these claims, this essay offers a reading of the Analytica in conjunction with the Physics in order to propose the following: if we are to think through Aristotle's method of discovery, we must first unhinge ourselves from the oppositional paradigm of empirical contra conceptual. Through the example of Aristotle's inquiry into nature, it is shown that Aristotle's method of discovery is, at once, one intimately betrothed to \"conceptual\" (or, more properly, \"dialogical\") resources, while also subtended by a comportment itself wakeful and perceptive of the being undergoing inquiry.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Nature of Epagôgê\",\"authors\":\"Russell Winslow\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE200611122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay pursues an interpretation of epagoge in Aristotle in order to challenge the current claims in the scholarship that Aristotle's method of discovery is, on the one hand, empirical or, on the other hand, a priori. In contrast to these claims, this essay offers a reading of the Analytica in conjunction with the Physics in order to propose the following: if we are to think through Aristotle's method of discovery, we must first unhinge ourselves from the oppositional paradigm of empirical contra conceptual. Through the example of Aristotle's inquiry into nature, it is shown that Aristotle's method of discovery is, at once, one intimately betrothed to \\\"conceptual\\\" (or, more properly, \\\"dialogical\\\") resources, while also subtended by a comportment itself wakeful and perceptive of the being undergoing inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE200611122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE200611122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章对亚里士多德的格言进行了解释,以挑战学术界目前的说法,即亚里士多德的发现方法一方面是经验的,另一方面是先验的。与这些主张相反,本文将《分析》与《物理学》结合起来进行解读,以便提出以下观点:如果我们要通过亚里士多德的发现方法进行思考,我们必须首先将自己从经验与概念对立的对立范式中解脱出来。通过亚里士多德探索自然的例子,我们可以看出,亚里士多德的发现方法,是一种与“概念的”(或更恰当地说,“对话的”)资源密切相关的方法,同时也以一种对被探索的存在具有清醒和感知的行为本身为支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Nature of Epagôgê
This essay pursues an interpretation of epagoge in Aristotle in order to challenge the current claims in the scholarship that Aristotle's method of discovery is, on the one hand, empirical or, on the other hand, a priori. In contrast to these claims, this essay offers a reading of the Analytica in conjunction with the Physics in order to propose the following: if we are to think through Aristotle's method of discovery, we must first unhinge ourselves from the oppositional paradigm of empirical contra conceptual. Through the example of Aristotle's inquiry into nature, it is shown that Aristotle's method of discovery is, at once, one intimately betrothed to "conceptual" (or, more properly, "dialogical") resources, while also subtended by a comportment itself wakeful and perceptive of the being undergoing inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信